The Department of Defense (“DoD”) has issued two Class Deviations that provide defense agencies with greater flexibility when procuring in times of crisis. These Class Deviations allow for the use of simplified acquisition procedures and excuse certain procurement obligations when DoD is responding to a cyber-attack or providing relief in support of domestic or international disasters.

On November 8, 2017, DoD issued Class Deviation 2018-O0001, which expands the types of procurements treated as commercial item acquisitions and exempts acquisitions in support of cyber-attacks, international disaster assistance, and “emergency or major disaster” relief from requirements to (i) comply with item unique identification, (ii) receive two offers, and (iii) limit the use of time and materials contracts. This Class Deviation also delegates authority for determinations relating to these acquisitions from the Secretary of Defense to the various heads of contracting activities within DoD.

There appears to be a typographical error in the attachment accompanying the November 8, 2017 Class Deviation memorandum. FAR section 12.102 permits agencies to treat acquisitions “used to facilitate defense against or recovery from nuclear, biological, chemical, or radiological attack” as an acquisition of commercial items. In the Class Deviation, DoD expands this exception to include defense against cyber-attacks. However, section 212.102 in the attachment leaves off the key phrase “as an acquisition of commercial items.” From context, however, it appears this is what DoD intended.

This Deviation is a follow-up to Class Deviation 2017-O0007, which implements amendments to 41 U.S.C. § 1903 imposed by sections 816 and 1641 of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) of 2017. Section 816 increased the micro-purchase threshold (from $5,000 to up to $30,000) and the simplified acquisition threshold (from $150,000 to up to $1.5 million) for acquisitions that “facilitate international disaster assistance or in support of response to an emergency or major disaster.” Section 1641 incorporated cyber-attacks as an additional basis for special emergency procurement authority. These changes also authorize DoD to add cyber-attacks, international disasters, and emergency or major disasters as grounds for procuring up to $13 million in commercial items under simplified acquisition processes pursuant to FAR 13.5.

Together, these changes provide DoD, and it contractors, with greater flexibility to respond to emergencies and times of crisis and subjects contractors to reduced procurement obligations when time is of the essence.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Susan B. Cassidy Susan B. Cassidy

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government…

Ms. Cassidy represents clients in the defense, intelligence, and information technologies sectors.  She works with clients to navigate the complex rules and regulations that govern federal procurement and her practice includes both counseling and litigation components.  Ms. Cassidy conducts internal investigations for government contractors and represents her clients before the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), Inspectors General (IG), and the Department of Justice with regard to those investigations.  From 2008 to 2012, Ms. Cassidy served as in-house counsel at Northrop Grumman Corporation, one of the world’s largest defense contractors, supporting both defense and intelligence programs. Previously, Ms. Cassidy held an in-house position with Motorola Inc., leading a team of lawyers supporting sales of commercial communications products and services to US government defense and civilian agencies. Prior to going in-house, Ms. Cassidy was a litigation and government contracts partner in an international law firm headquartered in Washington, DC.