<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</title>
      <link>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/</link>
      <description>Canada Pension &amp; Benefits Lawyers &amp; Attorneys : Osler Hoskin &amp; Harcourt Law Firm: Post-Employment Benefits &amp; Defined Benefit Plans : Toronto, New York</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:03:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:03:47 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.movabletype.org</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:info uri="pensionsbenefitslaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>Ontario Releases More Draft Pension Regulations: Disclosure Requirements</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/rdoe4q5Zt4g/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/another-category/ontario-releases-more-draft-pension-regulations-disclosure-requirements/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:02:50 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Anthony Devir</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Late last week, the Ontario government released another round of draft regulations. This time the focus is on disclosure of plan related documents to plan members, former members, retired members, and their spouses, as well as other specified persons. They include amendments with respect to the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/rdoe4q5Zt4g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/another-category/ontario-releases-more-draft-pension-regulations-disclosure-requirements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Does Your 401(k) Plan Have an Investment Policy Statement? That's Great, But Do Your Fiduciaries Follow It?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/64i0FIYH0Uk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/does-your-401k-plan-have-an-investment-policy-statement-thats-great-but-do-your-fiduciaries-follow-it/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 08:05:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Although investment policy statements are not required by the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), it is highly recommended that every 401(k) plan have one. An investment policy statement (IPS) can protect the plan committee or other fiduciary responsible for investments by setting...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/64i0FIYH0Uk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/does-your-401k-plan-have-an-investment-policy-statement-thats-great-but-do-your-fiduciaries-follow-it/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>British Columbia Bill 38 Includes Some Novel Pension Reforms</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/XvxnPA3A6ds/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/another-category/british-columbia-bill-38-includes-some-novel-pension-reforms/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Innovation &amp; Plan Design</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:30:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Jonathan Marin</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On April 30, 2012, British Columbia introduced Bill 38, Pension Benefits Standards Act, for first reading. If passed, the current British Columbia Pension Benefits Standards Act (PBSA) would be repealed and replaced in its entirety by Bill 38.

Bill 38 marks the first significant amendments to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/XvxnPA3A6ds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/another-category/british-columbia-bill-38-includes-some-novel-pension-reforms/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Federal Budget Bill Includes Changes for LTD Plans Sponsored by Federally-Regulated Employers</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/JkH0Wsgsm-U/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/benefit-plans/federal-budget-bill-includes-changes-for-ltd-plans-sponsored-by-federallyregulated-employers/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Benefit Plans</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 12:24:28 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Douglas Rienzo</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The federal government followed up on its Budget announcement earlier this year by introducing Bill C-38, Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, for first reading.

While much discussion of the Budget has focussed on proposed changes to Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement -...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/JkH0Wsgsm-U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/05/articles/benefit-plans/federal-budget-bill-includes-changes-for-ltd-plans-sponsored-by-federallyregulated-employers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Ontario Releases Long-Awaited Draft Pension Regulations</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/wPzarSEFAaU/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/another-category/ontario-releases-longawaited-draft-pension-regulations/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Wind-Ups</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Public Sector Plans</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Surplus</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:12:32 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Paul Litner</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Almost two years after passing its initial amendments to the Ontario Pension Benefits Act (the PBA) in Bill 236 and Bill 120, the Ontario government has released the first round of regulations required to implement its pension reform agenda. The regulations, which are in draft form and subject to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/wPzarSEFAaU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/another-category/ontario-releases-longawaited-draft-pension-regulations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Ontario Government Announces Consultation with Public Sector Plans</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/etwZIYkWIJo/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/public-sector-plans/ontario-government-announces-consultation-with-public-sector-plans/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Public Sector Plans</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:39:10 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Following up on its 2012 budget, the Ontario government announced that it will begin consultations on a new legislative framework for jointly sponsored public sector pension plans (JSPPs).

As the government indicated previously, their focus is to make public sector pension plans &amp;quot;more...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/etwZIYkWIJo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/public-sector-plans/ontario-government-announces-consultation-with-public-sector-plans/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Have You Assumed Pension Termination Liability? Long Arm of the U.S. PBGC Reaches Non-U.S. Parent</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/Xee-61hujQA/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/have-you-assumed-pension-termination-liability-long-arm-of-the-us-pbgc-reaches-nonus-parent/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:07:12 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>One of the most difficult rules for our non-U.S. based clients to accept is controlled group liability for plan termination under Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA). Under these rules, all members of the controlled group may be jointly and severally...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/Xee-61hujQA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/have-you-assumed-pension-termination-liability-long-arm-of-the-us-pbgc-reaches-nonus-parent/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Pension Plan Restructuring (Part I)</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/yw0QWQogp-0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/plan-conversions/pension-plan-restructuring-part-i/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Conversions</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Wind-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:51:25 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>James Fera</dc:creator>
      
      <description>These days, many plan sponsors are looking to exit the defined benefit (DB) world &amp;ndash; largely for the following reasons:&amp;nbsp;

    they want to cut benefit funding and administration costs, as market volatility and low interest rates drive up solvency deficits and make planning more...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/yw0QWQogp-0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/04/articles/plan-conversions/pension-plan-restructuring-part-i/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Ontario Budget Bill 55: PBA Amendments</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/WDvT-7Gzdws/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/another-category/ontario-budget-bill-55-pba-amendments/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:29:23 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On March 27, 2012, the Ontario government introduced Bill 55, Strong Action for Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2012, for first reading. Schedule 53 of Bill 55 sets out a number of amendments to the Ontario Pension Benefits Act (PBA) which relate to previous amendments that have not yet come into...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/WDvT-7Gzdws" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/another-category/ontario-budget-bill-55-pba-amendments/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Ontario Budget: Implications for Private and Public Sector Pensions</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/JKG_dgawJ1s/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/innovation-plan-design/ontario-budget-implications-for-private-and-public-sector-pensions/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Innovation &amp; Plan Design</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Innovation &amp; Plan Design</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Public Sector Plans</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:29:34 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Paul Litner</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Ontario government&amp;rsquo;s 2012 Budget, released yesterday, includes a number of announcements which will be of interest to administrators of both private and public sector pension plans.

Some Good News for Private Sector Employers

The government recognized that as a result of ongoing market...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/JKG_dgawJ1s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/innovation-plan-design/ontario-budget-implications-for-private-and-public-sector-pensions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>FSCO to Make Electronic Filing Mandatory</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/eSynBIHXnJk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/plan-administration/fsco-to-make-electronic-filing-mandatory/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:10:50 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Lesha Van Der Bij</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In March of 2010, the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) launched its Pension Services Portal (PSP), which enables plan administrators to&amp;nbsp;file&amp;nbsp;Annual Information Returns,&amp;nbsp;Investment Information Summaries, Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund Assessment Certificates, Pension...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/eSynBIHXnJk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/plan-administration/fsco-to-make-electronic-filing-mandatory/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Quebec Budget Considers Voluntary Retirement Savings Plans</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/xK4H9ZuWCzg/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/innovation-plan-design/quebec-budget-considers-voluntary-retirement-savings-plans/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Innovation &amp; Plan Design</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Julien Ranger-Musiol</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On March 20th, the Quebec government introduced its 2012-2013 Budget. The Budget included a section on &amp;ldquo;Retirement&amp;rdquo;, which notes the &amp;ldquo;insufficient savings&amp;rdquo; of some Quebec workers and, in response, proposes the implementation of Voluntary Retirement Savings Plans...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/xK4H9ZuWCzg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/innovation-plan-design/quebec-budget-considers-voluntary-retirement-savings-plans/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Canadian Equity Compensation 101</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/vpynKNn41qQ/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/canadian-equity-compensation-101/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Executive Compensation</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:36:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sandra Cohen</dc:creator>
      
      <description>As US multinational companies (and their related cross-border activities) continue to grow and expand, US lawyers and human resources professionals may be asked to consider issues related to equity compensation for their Canadian-based employees more and more. US employers operating in Canada must...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/vpynKNn41qQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/canadian-equity-compensation-101/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Are You Ready for a DOL Audit? 401(k) and Pensions Plans are in the Crosshairs</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/qpObK0NkiEM/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/are-you-ready-for-a-dol-audit-401k-and-pensions-plans-are-in-the-crosshairs/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:27:03 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>A recent report of U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) audit results contained some surprising statistics: almost 3 out of 4 audits find violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the average cost for a plan to correct them, including fines and penalties, is $450,000....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/qpObK0NkiEM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/are-you-ready-for-a-dol-audit-401k-and-pensions-plans-are-in-the-crosshairs/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Timminco Limited: CCAA Court Considers Fiduciary Obligations Post-Indalex</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/qLBcJnBmuzc/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/02/articles/bankruptcy/timminco-limited-ccaa-court-considers-fiduciary-obligations-postindalex/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Bankruptcy</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:34:47 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Timminco Limited is among the first reported cases to be released following the Ontario Court of Appeal&amp;rsquo;s April 7, 2011 decision in Re Indalex. There are two Timminco decisions &amp;ndash; Timminco 1 and Timminco 2.

Indalex Recap

Recall, that in Indalex, contrary to widely accepted principles...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/qLBcJnBmuzc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/02/articles/bankruptcy/timminco-limited-ccaa-court-considers-fiduciary-obligations-postindalex/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>OSFI Provides More Guidance re Letters of Credit</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/VrAhMdkkS14/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/02/articles/funding/osfi-provides-more-guidance-re-letters-of-credit/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">DB Plan Funding</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:40:27 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Lesha Van Der Bij</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Over the past two years we have seen a number of amendments to federal pension legislation with respect to the funding of defined benefit (DB) plans (see April 1, 2010 and December 17, 2010 posts). These reforms include amendments permitting plan sponsors to use letters of credit in lieu of making...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/VrAhMdkkS14" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/02/articles/funding/osfi-provides-more-guidance-re-letters-of-credit/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Orpin v. Littlechild: Will Revokes Insurance Policy Beneficiary Designation</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/f4tD4UEuWwc/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/01/articles/plan-administration/orpin-v-littlechild-will-revokes-insurance-policy-beneficiary-designation/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:03:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Douglas Rienzo</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The cases of Richardson Estate v. Mew and Tower Estate v. Tower Estate considered whether a provision in a separation agreement can revoke a prior beneficiary designation. In Orpin v. Littlechild, at issue was a provision included in the will of the deceased, and whether it had the effect of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/f4tD4UEuWwc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/01/articles/plan-administration/orpin-v-littlechild-will-revokes-insurance-policy-beneficiary-designation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Member Entitled to Deferred Pension Notwithstanding Earlier Payment of Small Pension</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/uL6y1v9BV9g/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/01/articles/partial-windups/member-entitled-to-deferred-pension-notwithstanding-earlier-payment-of-small-pension/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Wind-Ups</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:13:15 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Shortly (eight days) after a series of transactions under which Imasco Inc.&amp;rsquo;s Shoppers Drug Mart business was transferred to Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. (Shoppers) and then sold (share sale) to institutional investors, Mr. Boys&amp;rsquo; employment with Shoppers was terminated. As part of the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/uL6y1v9BV9g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2012/01/articles/partial-windups/member-entitled-to-deferred-pension-notwithstanding-earlier-payment-of-small-pension/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>U.S. 401(k) Disclosure Is Coming-What To Do In January</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/xZcgwgmxoN8/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2011/12/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/us-401k-disclosure-is-comingwhat-to-do-in-january/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:17:15 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In prior blog posts, (see posts from October 26, 2010 and July 15, 2011) I have described new participant fee and investment disclosure requirements that will apply to 401(k) plans and other participant-directed defined contribution plans beginning May 31, 2012. Many participants will learn for the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/xZcgwgmxoN8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2011/12/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/us-401k-disclosure-is-comingwhat-to-do-in-january/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Federal Government Releases Draft PRPP Tax Rules For Consultation</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/nb2VYf3bZOY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2011/12/articles/innovation-plan-design/federal-government-releases-draft-prpp-tax-rules-for-consultation/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/">Canada Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Innovation &amp; Plan Design</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:23:56 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Following its introduction of Bill C-25 on November 17, 2011 (see my prior blog post), the federal government released for consultation a package of draft legislative proposals under the Income Tax Act to accommodate the creation of Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs) within the basic system of...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/nb2VYf3bZOY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2011/12/articles/innovation-plan-design/federal-government-releases-draft-prpp-tax-rules-for-consultation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

