<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</title>
      <link>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/</link>
      <description>Canada Pension &amp; Benefits Lawyers &amp; Attorneys : Osler Hoskin &amp; Harcourt Law Firm: Post-Employment Benefits &amp; Defined Benefit Plans : Toronto, New York</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:11:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:11:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.movabletype.org</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:info uri="pensionsbenefitslaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pensionsbenefitslaw.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>The Myth of the "Hands Off" Prototype Plan</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/KOpR1_lUua8/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/the-myth-of-the-hands-off-prototype-plan/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:00:17 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>True or false? If you adopted a 401(k) plan offered by a U.S. prototype vendor, you can leave compliance entirely up to the vendor. You may be surprised to know that the answer is &amp;ldquo;false&amp;rdquo;.

An easy way to quickly adopt a U.S. tax-qualified savings plan, &amp;ldquo;prototype 401(k)...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/KOpR1_lUua8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/the-myth-of-the-hands-off-prototype-plan/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Proposed Amendments under the Income Tax Act for Employee Life and Health Trusts</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/aVJaiP1PWSA/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/benefit-plans/proposed-amendments-under-the-income-tax-act-for-employee-life-and-health-trusts/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Benefit Plans</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:37:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Stephanie Kauffman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Minister of Finance recently announced proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act creating a new vehicle, called an employee life and health trust (EL&amp;amp;H trust), through which employers can provide certain group benefits to their employees and former employees in a tax effective...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/aVJaiP1PWSA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/benefit-plans/proposed-amendments-under-the-income-tax-act-for-employee-life-and-health-trusts/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Federal Budget 2010: Changes to Taxation of Stock Options</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/bSj8Yira9do/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/executive-compensation/federal-budget-2010-changes-to-taxation-of-stock-options/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Executive Compensation</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:34:04 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Lesha Van Der Bij</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Canadian government recently tabled its budget for 2010, which proposes significant changes to the way in which both employees and employers are taxed in Canada on stock options, including:

    elimination of the deferral for public company stock options;
    restrictions on the deduction for...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/bSj8Yira9do" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/executive-compensation/federal-budget-2010-changes-to-taxation-of-stock-options/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Why Are Corporate Formalities Important?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/R_lOGhqk3TY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/why-are-corporate-formalities-important/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Executive Compensation</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:37:39 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sandra Cohen</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Many compensation and pension actions require the approval of a company&amp;rsquo;s board of directors, or a committee of the board, and for good reason. Employers should not skimp on the finalization of corporate approval via signed and dated board or committee resolutions.

U.S. Case in Point: A...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/R_lOGhqk3TY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/why-are-corporate-formalities-important/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Supreme Court of Canada to Consider Whether Pension Plan Benefits Based on Age are Contrary to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/b_Gx6G4sj10/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/plan-administration/supreme-court-of-canada-to-consider-whether-pension-plan-benefits-based-on-age-are-contrary-to-the-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Public Sector Plans</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:39:11 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Paul Litner</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Later this month, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear an appeal from the British Columbia Court of Appeal&amp;rsquo;s decision in Withler v. Canada. The issue in Withler is whether a supplementary death benefit under a pension plan that is reduced for every year the plan member&amp;rsquo;s age exceeds a...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/b_Gx6G4sj10" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/plan-administration/supreme-court-of-canada-to-consider-whether-pension-plan-benefits-based-on-age-are-contrary-to-the-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Early Retirement Package not Discriminatory</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/5Bhd4pEP2R0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/plan-administration/early-retirement-package-not-discriminatory/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Bankruptcy</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:08:57 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Louise Greig</dc:creator>
      
      <description>A recent decision from the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal has confirmed that an early retirement package which was offered to employees who met certain age requirements did not contravene the Ontario Human Rights Code.

In Kovacs v. Arcelor Mittal Montreal, the employer decided to close a plant as a...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/5Bhd4pEP2R0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/03/articles/plan-administration/early-retirement-package-not-discriminatory/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>New Mental Health and Substance Abuse Rules Redefine Parity</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/QZlXzImb9g8/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/new-mental-health-and-substance-abuse-rules-redefine-parity/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:36:43 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Does your U.S. group health plan have separate deductibles for medical benefits and mental health benefits? Even if they are the same dollar amount, new regulations provide that these plan provisions will violate federal benefit parity requirements.

Sponsors of U.S. group health plans who have...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/QZlXzImb9g8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/new-mental-health-and-substance-abuse-rules-redefine-parity/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Even-Handedness is in the Eye of the Beholder</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/oITX5-vpPws/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/evenhandedness-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:43:17 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Ian J.F. McSweeney</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Trustees and other fiduciaries are often described as having to act fairly in discharging their responsibilities to pension and health and welfare plan members. While most people have a strong sense of what is generally fair and unfair, the concept becomes more complicated when it is applied to the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/oITX5-vpPws" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/evenhandedness-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>British Columbia's Initiative to Expand Pension Coverage</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/j4XzSnIQ6Co/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/another-category/british-columbias-initiative-to-expand-pension-coverage/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:40:18 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Stephanie Kauffman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In the last two years, four provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario and Nova Scotia) and the Federal government have embarked on extensive pension reviews. While the focus of these reviews, for the most part, was on how each jurisdiction&amp;rsquo;s pension standards legislation could be...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/j4XzSnIQ6Co" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/another-category/british-columbias-initiative-to-expand-pension-coverage/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Pension Plan Communications: Redux</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/qhmPpEutm6s/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/pension-plan-communications-redux/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:57:24 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Evan Howard</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Paul Litner's post Plan Communications: The New Battleground for Pension Disputes highlighted recent cases, which reinforced the need for employers to make accurate and timely pension plan member communications a top priority in plan governance and risk management. The recent Re Greyhound Canada...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/qhmPpEutm6s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/pension-plan-communications-redux/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>FSCO Moves to Electronic Filing of AIRs</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/AgtGIOujsUI/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/fsco-moves-to-electronic-filing-of-airs/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:40:51 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Lesha Van Der Bij</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Financial Services Commission of Ontario announced that effective March 31, 2010 pension plan administrators will be able to file Annual Information Returns (AIRs) electronically. The electronic filing method will be optional in that plan administrators will still be permitted to file AIRs in...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/AgtGIOujsUI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/02/articles/plan-administration/fsco-moves-to-electronic-filing-of-airs/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>CAPSA Consultation Update - Prudence Standard in Pension Plan Funding and Investments</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/L0Cp2LIPhi0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/capsa-consultation-update-prudence-standard-in-pension-plan-funding-and-investments/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Investments</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:55:43 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Stephanie Kauffman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>As I discussed in an earlier&amp;nbsp;post, the Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities recently published a consultation paper entitled &amp;ldquo;The Prudence Standard and the Roles of the Plan Sponsor and Plan Administrator in Pension Plan Funding and Investment&amp;rdquo; (PDF). The comment...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/L0Cp2LIPhi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/capsa-consultation-update-prudence-standard-in-pension-plan-funding-and-investments/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>FSCO Attempts to Address Delays in Processing DB Plan Applications, but Legislative Reform Also Required</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/Vw2GFOT_2HY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/regulator-policies-communicati/fsco-attempts-to-address-delays-in-processing-db-plan-applications-but-legislative-reform-also-required/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Wind-Ups</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Surplus</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:13:20 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Douglas Rienzo</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In January 2010, the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) released a consultation paper outlining proposals to streamline the regulatory review process for defined benefit (DB) applications&amp;nbsp;(PDF). The proposals outlined in the most recent paper &amp;ndash; an earlier consultation...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/Vw2GFOT_2HY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/regulator-policies-communicati/fsco-attempts-to-address-delays-in-processing-db-plan-applications-but-legislative-reform-also-required/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Tribunal Looks to "Best Evidence" in Rejecting Former Employee's Claim to Pension Entitlement</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/zv7gAM5J8Qc/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/tribunal-looks-to-best-evidence-in-rejecting-former-employees-claim-to-pension-entitlement/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:17:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Lorne Neudorf</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Financial Service Tribunal&amp;rsquo;s decision in Redmann v. Superintendent of Financial Services, (PDF)&amp;nbsp;deals with the retention by pension plan administrators of accurate records relating to the termination of plan members' employment.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(FSCO has also recently recommended keeping...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/zv7gAM5J8Qc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/tribunal-looks-to-best-evidence-in-rejecting-former-employees-claim-to-pension-entitlement/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Check Your Loan Documents: New PBGC Reportable Event Rules May Impact Corporate Transactions</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/i_k0o85_wiY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/check-your-loan-documents-new-pbgc-reportable-event-rules-may-impact-corporate-transactions/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:10:51 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Whenever the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the ultimate insurer of participant benefits under U.S. pension plans, re-evaluates the vast scope of its risk exposure, you can be sure that private employers will be subject to increased responsibilities and monitoring. This time, the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/i_k0o85_wiY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/check-your-loan-documents-new-pbgc-reportable-event-rules-may-impact-corporate-transactions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Hydro One Decision: What are the Implications for Plan Wind-Ups in Light of Pending Pension Reform?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/cAVwa8pRhhQ/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/partial-windups/hydro-one-decision-what-are-the-implications-for-plan-windups-in-light-of-pending-pension-reform/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Wind-Ups</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Surplus</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:22:11 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Louise Greig</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Ontario Court of Appeal&amp;rsquo;s recent decision in Hydro One confirmed that the Superintendent may use a &amp;ldquo;subset analysis&amp;rdquo; when assessing the &amp;ldquo;significance&amp;rdquo; of plan member terminations for purposes of ordering a partial plan wind-up. The impact of this decision may be...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/cAVwa8pRhhQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/partial-windups/hydro-one-decision-what-are-the-implications-for-plan-windups-in-light-of-pending-pension-reform/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Correcting Plan Document Mistakes under 409A: Employers Breathe a Bit Easier</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/bnDipeMFb1w/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/correcting-plan-document-mistakes-under-409a-employers-breathe-a-bit-easier/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:26:07 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sandra Cohen</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Employers trying to comply with one of the most complex U.S. tax code sections can breathe a little easier this week. The IRS has issued relief for certain inadvertent plan language failures under Section 409A of the U.S. tax code that would otherwise trap employers who improperly drafted deferred...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/bnDipeMFb1w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/correcting-plan-document-mistakes-under-409a-employers-breathe-a-bit-easier/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Ontario Bill 236 Expansion of Grow-In Rights May Prove Costly</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/HNl3MYLnZdo/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/another-category/ontario-bill-236-expansion-of-growin-rights-may-prove-costly/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Legislation &amp; Regulations</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Pension Reform</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:52:52 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Stephanie Kauffman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Pension Benefits Amendment Act, 2009 (Bill 236) proposes to extend &amp;ldquo;grow-in rights&amp;rdquo; to all Ontario pension plan members whose employment is involuntarily terminated (other than for cause). While this measure was recommended in the Report of the Expert Commission on Pensions (the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/HNl3MYLnZdo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/another-category/ontario-bill-236-expansion-of-growin-rights-may-prove-costly/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>FSCO Proposed Policy on Record Retention Will Impose New Obligations on Plan Administrators</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/y5jD_DD8KH8/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/fsco-proposed-policy-on-record-retention-will-impose-new-obligations-on-plan-administrators/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Plan Administration</category><category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">Regulator Policies &amp; Communications</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:20:59 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Louise Greig</dc:creator>
      
      <description>If you are responsible for the day-to-day administration of a pension plan, you should take the time to review a consultation policy on record retention released by FSCO&amp;nbsp;just before the holidays.

Why should you be concerned?

Because the consultation policy imposes new obligations on plan...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/y5jD_DD8KH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2010/01/articles/plan-administration/fsco-proposed-policy-on-record-retention-will-impose-new-obligations-on-plan-administrators/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>U.S. COBRA Subsidy Extended at the 11th Hour</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~3/cP_nZwrCoN4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2009/12/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/us-cobra-subsidy-extended-at-the-11th-hour/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/articles">U.S. Pensions &amp; Benefits Law</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:34:49 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Carol Buckmann</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Fiscal Year 2010 Defense Appropriations Act just signed by President Obama extends eligibility for the 65% COBRA premium subsidy through February 28, 2010, as well as the maximum period during which the subsidy is available from nine to fifteen months.&amp;nbsp; The two month eligibility extension...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PensionsBenefitsLaw/~4/cP_nZwrCoN4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pensionsbenefitslaw.com/2009/12/articles/us-pensions-benefits-law/us-cobra-subsidy-extended-at-the-11th-hour/</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
