<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Government Contracts Legal Forum</title>
      <link>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/</link>
      <description>Government Contracts Lawyers &amp; Attorneys for Litigation &amp; Counseling</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:20:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:20:37 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.movabletype.org</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:info uri="governmentcontractslegalforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>GovernmentContractsLegalForum</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>Increased Debarment for Small Business Misrepresentations?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/a7Ur91Ntfi0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/small-business-1/increased-debarment-for-small-business-misrepresentations/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Comprehensive Contingency Contracting Reform Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Consolidated Appropriations Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">House Committee on Armed Services</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">NDAA</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">National Defense Authorization Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">SDO</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Small Business</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Small Business Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">suspension and debarment official</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:55:35 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Richard W. Arnholt </dc:creator>
      
      <description>Section 1683 of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, H.R. 4310, as approved last week by the House Committee on Armed Services, proposes an amendment to the Small Business Act to clarify that misrepresentation as to small business status in order to obtain certain prime contracts or...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/a7Ur91Ntfi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/small-business-1/increased-debarment-for-small-business-misrepresentations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Rehabilitation Or Punishment? -- The Evolution of Suspension and Debarment</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/SbjWdlbBwA4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/suspension-debarment/rehabilitation-or-punishment-the-evolution-of-suspension-and-debarment/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAR</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Federal Acquisition Regulation</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">SDO</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">suspension and debarment official</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:51:33 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Alexina Jackson</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Recent legislative trends appear to be squarely at odds with the stated&amp;nbsp;purpose of suspension and debarment.&amp;nbsp;The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) describes a process focusing on &amp;ldquo;present responsibility,&amp;rdquo; an express acknowledgement of the potential for contractor...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/SbjWdlbBwA4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/suspension-debarment/rehabilitation-or-punishment-the-evolution-of-suspension-and-debarment/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>CISPA Faces Uphill Battle</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/96fHh_jkfY0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/cybersecurity-1/cispa-faces-uphill-battle/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">CISPA</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Cybersecurity</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">cyber intelligence sharing and protection act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">data</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">privacy</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">protection</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 08:24:15 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Kate Molony</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Proponents of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (more commonly known as CISPA) won a small battle last month when the House of Representatives passed the proposed bill by a vote of 248 to 168, with 42 yays from Democrats.&amp;nbsp; Yet the war for comprehensive cybersecurity legislation...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/96fHh_jkfY0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/05/articles/cybersecurity-1/cispa-faces-uphill-battle/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Suspension and Debarment - Why can't you be more like the Air Force?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/pbwUy8sH6G4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-why-cant-you-be-more-like-the-air-force/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Air Force</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Senator Claire McCaskill</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">The Comprehensive Contingency Contracting Reform Act of 2012</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:05:47 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Bob Wagman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>&amp;nbsp;Although not conveyed in those exact words, that sentiment was expressed at several points by Chairman McCaskill during a hearing on April 17 before the Senate Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on&amp;nbsp;The Comprehensive...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/pbwUy8sH6G4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-why-cant-you-be-more-like-the-air-force/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>C&amp;M Lawyers Conduct Live Webinar on Government Contract Changes on Wednesday, May 16</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/qcTxYx-EMFs/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/featured/cm-lawyers-conduct-live-webinar-on-government-contract-changes-on-wednesday-may-16/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">L2 Federal Resources</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">webinar</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:05:10 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>J. Chris Haile</dc:creator>
      
      <description>At 1 p.m. (Eastern) on Wednesday, May 16, 2012, Crowell &amp;amp; Moring government contracts attorneys Chris Haile and Brian Tully McLaughlin will be conducting a webinar entitled &amp;ldquo;Government Contract Changes:&amp;nbsp; How They Impact Your Bottom Line&amp;rdquo; on behalf of L2 Federal Resources....&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/qcTxYx-EMFs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/featured/cm-lawyers-conduct-live-webinar-on-government-contract-changes-on-wednesday-may-16/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Pressure Grows for DoD to In-House Certain Federal Contracts</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/Eu4pN9l8aos/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/insourcing/pressure-grows-for-dod-to-inhouse-certain-federal-contracts/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Department of Defense</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">DoD</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAR § 7.503(c)</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAR § 7.503(d)</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">GAO</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Government Accountability Office</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">In-Sourcing</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:09:11 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Raja Mishra</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Department of Defense (&amp;ldquo;DoD&amp;rdquo;) continues to contract out work that should be handled by federal employees, according to a new Government Accountability Office (&amp;ldquo;GAO&amp;rdquo;) study, which finds shortcomings in DoD&amp;rsquo;s tracking and management of such &amp;ldquo;inherently...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/Eu4pN9l8aos" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/insourcing/pressure-grows-for-dod-to-inhouse-certain-federal-contracts/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Physical Possession Not Required to Demonstrate a Paper Proposal Is "Under the Government's Control" Prior to Submission Deadline</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/v7uA2pFYnNY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/bid-protest/physical-possession-not-required-to-demonstrate-a-paper-proposal-is-under-the-governments-control-prior-to-submission-deadline/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Bid Protest</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Court of Federal Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">DIA</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Defense Intelligence Agency</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">EOR</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Electronic On-Ramp, Inc.</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAR 15.208</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAR 52.215-1</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:20:19 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sarah Gleich</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In a recently unsealed decision, Judge Damich of the Court of Federal Claims sustained a pre-award protest by The Electronic On-Ramp, Inc. (&amp;ldquo;EOR&amp;rdquo;), finding that the Defense Intelligence Agency (&amp;ldquo;DIA&amp;rdquo;) improperly rejected EOR&amp;rsquo;s bid as late where, although an electronic...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/v7uA2pFYnNY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/bid-protest/physical-possession-not-required-to-demonstrate-a-paper-proposal-is-under-the-governments-control-prior-to-submission-deadline/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>C&amp;M Lawyers to Conduct Live Webinar on the Buy American Act, Trade Agreements Act and Other Domestic Preference Restrictions</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/C73wPoZ2ObY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/legal-developments/cm-lawyers-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-the-buy-american-act-trade-agreements-act-and-other-domestic-preference-restrictions/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">domestic source restrictions</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">webinar</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:09:01 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Adelicia R. Cliffe</dc:creator>
      
      <description>At 1 p.m. (Eastern) on Thursday, April 5, 2012, Crowell &amp;amp; Moring government contracts attorney Addie Cliffe and international trade attorney J.J. Saulino will be conducting a webinar entitled &amp;ldquo;Navigating the Buy American Act, Trade Agreements Act and Other Domestic Preference...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/C73wPoZ2ObY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/04/articles/legal-developments/cm-lawyers-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-the-buy-american-act-trade-agreements-act-and-other-domestic-preference-restrictions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Congress Considers Tough Anti-Human Trafficking Rules for Contractors</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/4Z-_hTKxk40/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/legal-developments/congress-considers-tough-antihuman-trafficking-rules-for-contractors/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">human trafficking</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:14:43 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Raja Mishra</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Government contractors could soon be required to create anti-human trafficking compliance plans and face stiff penalties, including criminal charges, for using trafficked labor.



On March 27, 2012, anti-trafficking bills were simultaneously introduced in both chambers of Congress following recent...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/4Z-_hTKxk40" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/legal-developments/congress-considers-tough-antihuman-trafficking-rules-for-contractors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>D.C. District Court Holds That It Lacks Jurisdiction Over In-Sourcing Claim</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/GvCsWM8N2BI/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/insourcing/dc-district-court-holds-that-it-lacks-jurisdiction-over-insourcing-claim/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Administrative Procedure Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Court of Federal Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">In-Sourcing</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Tucker Act</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:38:13 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Grant J. Book</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Just a quick in-sourcing update for today.&amp;nbsp;On March 19, 2011, in Fisher-Cal Industries, Inc. v. United States, et. al, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion dismissing plaintiff&amp;rsquo;s in-sourcing claim.&amp;nbsp;No 11-791 (D.D.C. Mar. 19, 2012).&amp;nbsp;As...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/GvCsWM8N2BI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/insourcing/dc-district-court-holds-that-it-lacks-jurisdiction-over-insourcing-claim/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>C&amp;M Lawyers to Conduct Live Webinar on Government Contracts Intellectual Property Rules</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/bAqZqcJGfW4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/intellectual-property/cm-lawyers-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-government-contracts-intellectual-property-rules/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Intellectual Property</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">webinar</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:31:47 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Jonathan M. Baker</dc:creator>
      
      <description>At 1:00 p.m. EDT on March 29, 2012, Crowell &amp;amp; Moring partner John McCarthy and Jon Baker will conduct a webinar on behalf of L2 Federal Resources entitled &amp;ldquo;Intellectual Property Rights in Government Contracts: Overview and Recent Changes.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;This 90-minute webinar will provide an...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/bAqZqcJGfW4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/intellectual-property/cm-lawyers-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-government-contracts-intellectual-property-rules/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Attempting to Broaden the Mandatory Suspension &amp; Debarment Net: McCaskill - Webb Senate Bill 2139</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/bKSSGNTYPVA/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/suspension-debarment/attempting-to-broaden-the-mandatory-suspension-debarment-net-mccaskill-webb-senate-bill-2139/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Comprehensive Contingency Contracting Reform Act of 2012</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:50:12 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Alexina Jackson</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In January and February, my colleague, Bob Wagman, wrote about complications related to provisions on suspension and debarment in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74)&amp;nbsp;(1/18/12)&amp;nbsp;(2/23/12).&amp;nbsp;The provisions in the 2012 Appropriations Act were all premised on the...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/bKSSGNTYPVA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/suspension-debarment/attempting-to-broaden-the-mandatory-suspension-debarment-net-mccaskill-webb-senate-bill-2139/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Commercial Items:  New Requirement for Higher-Level Approval of Commercial Services</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/GJs6tRO3SwE/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/featured/commercial-items-new-requirement-for-higherlevel-approval-of-commercial-services/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Commercial Items</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">DFARS</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">DoD</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Panel on Contracting Integrity</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:12:38 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Alexina Jackson</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On Monday, DoD issued a final rule in a continuing effort to reduce the potentially inappropriate use of commercial item contracts.&amp;nbsp;DFARS: Commercial Determination Approval, 77 Fed. Reg. 14,480, (Mar. 12, 2012) (to be codified at 48 C.F.R. pt. 212).&amp;nbsp;The rule, most notably, modifies DFARS...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/GJs6tRO3SwE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/featured/commercial-items-new-requirement-for-higherlevel-approval-of-commercial-services/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>DOJ Renews Effort on Parallel Civil, Criminal, Regulatory and Administrative Proceedings</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/egWVYrTpzLY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/false-claims/doj-renews-effort-on-parallel-civil-criminal-regulatory-and-administrative-proceedings/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">DOJ</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">False Claims</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:14:46 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Raja Mishra</dc:creator>
      
      <description>U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder recently issued a DOJ-wide memorandum urging federal government attorneys to coordinate when conducting parallel civil, criminal, regulatory and administrative proceedings.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;



Holder wrote that parallel criminal and civil investigations would deter...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/egWVYrTpzLY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/03/articles/false-claims/doj-renews-effort-on-parallel-civil-criminal-regulatory-and-administrative-proceedings/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Imposition of Substantial Penalties Under The FCA Where No Damages Are Found Violates Eighth Amendment</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/if9dsIIeY80/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/false-claims/imposition-of-substantial-penalties-under-the-fca-where-no-damages-are-found-violates-eighth-amendment/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Eighth Amendment</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">False Claims</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:10:10 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dalal Hasan</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Last week, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in U.S. ex rel. Bunk v. Birkart Globistics GmbH &amp;amp; Co., et al. (a qui tam case in which the government did not intervene) declined to impose statutory penalties on the jury&amp;rsquo;s finding of 9,136 false claims (invoices...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/if9dsIIeY80" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/false-claims/imposition-of-substantial-penalties-under-the-fca-where-no-damages-are-found-violates-eighth-amendment/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Suspension and Debarment - Agencies grapple with the statutory exclusion for felony convictions in the FY 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/N4xx1BeMx9c/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-agencies-grapple-with-the-statutory-exclusion-for-felony-convictions-in-the-fy-2012-consolidated-appropriations-act/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:30:57 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Bob Wagman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In our earlier post, we discussed the provisions sprinkled throughout the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74) that prohibit certain agencies from using federal appropriated funds &amp;ldquo;to enter into a contract . . .[with] any corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/N4xx1BeMx9c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-agencies-grapple-with-the-statutory-exclusion-for-felony-convictions-in-the-fy-2012-consolidated-appropriations-act/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Proposed Defense Budget Reflects National Security Priorities</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/vgb2xMpnJGI/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/defense-budget/proposed-defense-budget-reflects-national-security-priorities/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Budget Control Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Defense Budget</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">national security</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:12:07 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Kate Molony</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In an effort to comply with the 2011 Budget Control Act, the Department of Defense has proposed a &amp;ldquo;difficult but manageable&amp;rdquo; budget that will save approximately $259 billion over the next five years, totaling $487 billion in savings within a decade.&amp;nbsp;Coordinated with President...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/vgb2xMpnJGI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/defense-budget/proposed-defense-budget-reflects-national-security-priorities/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Come join Crowell &amp; Moring on February 15, 2012, as it hosts the ABA's "Cyber on the Hill" with Congressman Jim Langevin</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/oLptHu0WWoM/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/cybersecurity-1/come-join-crowell-moring-on-february-15-2012-as-it-hosts-the-abas-cyber-on-the-hill-with-congressman-jim-langevin/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Cybersecurity</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:42:28 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>David Z. Bodenheimer</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Congressman Langevin (RI-D) serves as one of the leading experts and thought-leaders on Capitol Hill on cybersecurity developments and initiatives.&amp;nbsp;He is the Co-Founder and Co-Chair of the bipartisan House Cybersecurity Caucus and previously co-chaired the Center for Strategic and...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/oLptHu0WWoM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/cybersecurity-1/come-join-crowell-moring-on-february-15-2012-as-it-hosts-the-abas-cyber-on-the-hill-with-congressman-jim-langevin/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>C&amp;M Attorneys to Conduct Live Webinar on Organizational and Personal Conflicts of Interest, Regulatory Requirements, and Compliance Strategies</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/b9gut4UMFfU/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/organizational-conflict-of-int/cm-attorneys-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-organizational-and-personal-conflicts-of-interest-regulatory-requirements-and-compliance-strategies/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Conflicts of Interest</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">L2 Federal Resources</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Organizational Conflict of Interest</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">webinar</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:13:19 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>James G. Peyster</dc:creator>
      
      <description>At 1pm EST on February 9, 2012, Crowell &amp;amp; Moring government contracts attorneys Peter Eyre and James Peyster will be conducting a webinar entitled &amp;ldquo;Conflicts of Interest in Government Contracting: Reducing Risk in an Age of Increased Visibility&amp;rdquo; on behalf of L2 Federal...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/b9gut4UMFfU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/02/articles/organizational-conflict-of-int/cm-attorneys-to-conduct-live-webinar-on-organizational-and-personal-conflicts-of-interest-regulatory-requirements-and-compliance-strategies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Bill Would Authorize New "Preferences" and Calls for Stick to Ensure Agencies Award Contracts to Small Business Concerns</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/PJ82Mb-AcMg/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/small-business-1/bill-would-authorize-new-preferences-and-calls-for-stick-to-ensure-agencies-award-contracts-to-small-business-concerns/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Bill Owens</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Small Business</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Small Business Growth and Federal Accountability Act of 2012</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Tiffany Wynn</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On Wednesday, Congressman Bill Owens (D-NY) introduced the Small Business Growth and Federal Accountability Act of 2012 (H.R. 3779).&amp;nbsp;The bill is designed to ensure that government agencies provide more work for small business concern by authorizing blanket preferences and providing for...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/PJ82Mb-AcMg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/small-business-1/bill-would-authorize-new-preferences-and-calls-for-stick-to-ensure-agencies-award-contracts-to-small-business-concerns/</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

