<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Government Contracts Legal Forum</title>
      <link>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/</link>
      <description>Government Contracts Lawyers &amp; Attorneys for Litigation &amp; Counseling</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.movabletype.org</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:info uri="governmentcontractslegalforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>GovernmentContractsLegalForum</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.governmentcontractslegalforum.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>Bill Would Authorize New "Preferences" and Calls for Stick to Ensure Agencies Award Contracts to Small Business Concerns</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/PJ82Mb-AcMg/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/small-business-1/bill-would-authorize-new-preferences-and-calls-for-stick-to-ensure-agencies-award-contracts-to-small-business-concerns/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Bill Owens</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Small Business</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Small Business Growth and Federal Accountability Act of 2012</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Tiffany Wynn</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On Wednesday, Congressman Bill Owens (D-NY) introduced the Small Business Growth and Federal Accountability Act of 2012 (H.R. 3779).&amp;nbsp;The bill is designed to ensure that government agencies provide more work for small business concern by authorizing blanket preferences and providing for...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/PJ82Mb-AcMg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/small-business-1/bill-would-authorize-new-preferences-and-calls-for-stick-to-ensure-agencies-award-contracts-to-small-business-concerns/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Suspension and Debarment - What have they done now?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/-gxLlFC9fXU/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-what-have-they-done-now/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:17:24 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Bob Wagman</dc:creator>
      
      <description>Guaranteed to create uncertainty, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74), which President Obama signed into law on December 23, 2011 (the &amp;ldquo;Act&amp;rdquo;), included several little-noticed provisions generally excluding the use of federal funds for any corporation convicted...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/-gxLlFC9fXU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/suspension-debarment/suspension-and-debarment-what-have-they-done-now/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Fifth Circuit Weighs In on Where to Find Jurisdiction for In-Sourcing Claims</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/_fYB8KE6LJk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/insourcing/fifth-circuit-weighs-in-on-where-to-find-jurisdiction-for-insourcing-claims/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Court of Federal Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Fifth Circuit</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">In-Sourcing</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Rothe Development, Inc.</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Tucker Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">jurisdiction</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">procurement</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:08:16 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Grant J. Book</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On December 29, 2011, the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion in Rothe Development, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense, No. 11-50101 (5th Cir. Dec. 29, 2011), affirming the district court&amp;rsquo;s dismissal of an in-sourcing claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.&amp;nbsp;Under the Tucker...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/_fYB8KE6LJk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/insourcing/fifth-circuit-weighs-in-on-where-to-find-jurisdiction-for-insourcing-claims/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>What Will The New Year Bring For Government Contractors?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/CcJUC9yj9Qg/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/legal-developments/what-will-the-new-year-bring-for-government-contractors/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:25:06 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Peter J. Eyre</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On Thursday, January 19, 2012, from 2:00 - 3:30 pm EST, please join us for this webinar, &amp;quot;What Will the New Year Bring for Government Contractors? Top Headlines, Headaches, and Legal Developments to Watch in 2012.&amp;rdquo; As we begin the new year, government contractors are facing significant...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/CcJUC9yj9Qg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/legal-developments/what-will-the-new-year-bring-for-government-contractors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Contractors Can Review and Object to Public Release of Information in FAPIIS</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/B9iWcndzf48/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/reporting-and-disclosure/contractors-can-review-and-object-to-public-release-of-information-in-fapiis/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FAPIIS</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Reporting and Disclosure</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:40:14 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Peter J. Eyre</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On January 3, 2012, the FAR Council issued a final rule&amp;nbsp;to implement a congressional mandate that the public have access to all information (excluding past performance reviews) in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (&amp;quot;FAPIIS&amp;quot;). FAPIIS was created in 2010...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/B9iWcndzf48" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2012/01/articles/reporting-and-disclosure/contractors-can-review-and-object-to-public-release-of-information-in-fapiis/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>DOJ Fraud and False Claims Recoveries at Record Levels in FY2011</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/_53zcw-Kfkk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/12/articles/false-claims/doj-fraud-and-false-claims-recoveries-at-record-levels-in-fy2011/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">False Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Qui Tam</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:26:53 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Raja Mishra</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The U.S. Department of Justice reported this week that it recovered $5.6 billion in criminal and civil fraud payments in fiscal year 2011, including more than $3 billion under the civil False Claims Act. &amp;nbsp;The fraud recoveries set a one-year record for DOJ; the FCA recoveries capped a...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/_53zcw-Kfkk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/12/articles/false-claims/doj-fraud-and-false-claims-recoveries-at-record-levels-in-fy2011/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Department of Defense Proposes Adequacy Checklists for Offerors</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/ZuaZXEj0jIg/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/12/articles/legal-developments/department-of-defense-proposes-adequacy-checklists-for-offerors/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 12:28:15 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Derek Mullins</dc:creator>
      
      <description>&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; On December 2, 2011, the Department of Defense (&amp;ldquo;DoD&amp;rdquo;) proposed a new rule that would require contractors bidding on specified solicitations to submit proposal adequacy checklists with their offers. The new proposed DFARS section, &amp;sect; 215.408(3), would give...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/ZuaZXEj0jIg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/12/articles/legal-developments/department-of-defense-proposes-adequacy-checklists-for-offerors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>In Case You Missed Our Webinar About Personal Conflicts Of Interest And The New FAR Clause 52.203-16</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/qqU0kAKkqxY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/legal-developments/in-case-you-missed-our-webinar-about-personal-conflicts-of-interest-and-the-new-far-clause-5220316/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">PCI</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Personal Conflict of Interest</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:39:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Peter J. Eyre</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On November 16, hundreds of government contractors joined us for a webinar about the new personal conflicts of interest (&amp;ldquo;PCI&amp;rdquo;) requirements and the new implementing FAR provision, 52.203-16. It was a lively discussion and we explored some of the questions and challenges relating to...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/qqU0kAKkqxY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/legal-developments/in-case-you-missed-our-webinar-about-personal-conflicts-of-interest-and-the-new-far-clause-5220316/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Weeding Out Bad Contractors -- The Government's Push to Enhance its Suspension and Debarment Function</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/1Zr40FYGpEY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/suspension-debarment/weeding-out-bad-contractors-the-governments-push-to-enhance-its-suspension-and-debarment-function/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Daniel Gordon</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">David Sims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">OMB</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Steven Shaw</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Suspension &amp; Debarment</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:35:18 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel R. Forman </dc:creator>
      
      <description>It should come as no surprise to those involved in the federal procurement marketplace that, under the Obama administration, the Government has sought to strengthen accountability in government contracting, and, to that end, has resorted to a number of tools in the Government&amp;rsquo;s arsenal for...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/1Zr40FYGpEY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/suspension-debarment/weeding-out-bad-contractors-the-governments-push-to-enhance-its-suspension-and-debarment-function/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Webinar: Understanding and Implementing the New FAR Contractor Personal Conflict of Interest Provisions</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/0IipIddOY78/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/legal-developments/webinar-understanding-and-implementing-the-new-far-contractor-personal-conflict-of-interest-provisions/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Legal Developments</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Personal Conflict of Interest</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:47:08 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>James G. Peyster</dc:creator>
      
      <description>&amp;nbsp;We invite you to join us on November 16 at 3pm EST for a complimentary webinar, &amp;ldquo;Understanding and Implementing the New FAR Contractor Personal Conflict of Interest Provisions.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;
On November 2, 2011, the FAR Councils issued a final rule amending the Federal Acquisition...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/0IipIddOY78" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/legal-developments/webinar-understanding-and-implementing-the-new-far-contractor-personal-conflict-of-interest-provisions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Department of Defense Proposes Expanded Property Reporting Rule</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/UUZoDJjW_IE/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/reporting-and-disclosure/department-of-defense-proposes-expanded-property-reporting-rule/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Reporting and Disclosure</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:48:20 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Grant J. Book</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On October 19, 2011, the Department of Defense (&amp;ldquo;DoD&amp;rdquo;) proposed a new rule to amend DFARS &amp;sect; 252.211-7007 to remove the $5000 threshold from reporting requirements for Government-furnished property.&amp;nbsp; The proposed rule would require contractors to report Government-furnished...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/UUZoDJjW_IE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/reporting-and-disclosure/department-of-defense-proposes-expanded-property-reporting-rule/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Court of Federal Claim's Task and Delivery Order Jurisdiction May Be Back in Play</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/B9cXyKi8h_g/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/bid-protest/the-court-of-federal-claims-task-and-delivery-order-jurisdiction-may-be-back-in-play/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Bid Protest</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Task and delivery order</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">jurisdiction</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 07:38:43 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sarah Gleich</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In September, I wrote about the Court of Federal Claims&amp;rsquo; decision in MED Trends, Inc. v. United States, No. 11-420 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 13, 2011), where the Court concluded that it now enjoys jurisdiction over civilian task and delivery order procurements of any dollar value.&amp;nbsp;Prior to this...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/B9cXyKi8h_g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/11/articles/bid-protest/the-court-of-federal-claims-task-and-delivery-order-jurisdiction-may-be-back-in-play/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Chance to Change Pricing Generally Required After Corrective Action</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/tI3HngiU0zs/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/10/articles/bid-protest/chance-to-change-pricing-generally-required-after-corrective-action/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Bid Protest</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:23:23 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>James G. Peyster</dc:creator>
      
      <description>This week, GAO released a decision in Power Connector, Inc., B-404916.2, Aug. 15, 2011, 2011 WL 5029615&amp;nbsp;that appears to introduce a significant change to the circumstances in which a procuring agency may limit the scope of proposal revisions during corrective action.&amp;nbsp;

Prior GAO precedent...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/tI3HngiU0zs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/10/articles/bid-protest/chance-to-change-pricing-generally-required-after-corrective-action/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>$199.5 Million Settlement for GSA in FCA Action Against Schedule Holder</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/NVAf_seCnrk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/10/articles/false-claims/1995-million-settlement-for-gsa-in-fca-action-against-schedule-holder/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FSS</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">False Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Federal Supply Schedule</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">GSA Schedule</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Price Reduction Clause</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Qui Tam</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">commercial sales practices</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">discounts</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">relator</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:08:17 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>J. Catherine Kunz</dc:creator>
      
      <description>GSA has now topped the $128 million settlement it reached in 2009 with NetApp &amp;ndash; then the largest settlement reached in an FCA action against a GSA Schedule contractor &amp;ndash; by settling with Oracle Corporation and Oracle America Inc. this past week in the amount of $199.5 million plus...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/NVAf_seCnrk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/10/articles/false-claims/1995-million-settlement-for-gsa-in-fca-action-against-schedule-holder/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>The Court of Federal Claims Opens Its Doors to Protests of Civilian Task and Delivery Order Procurements</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/6f8b-z84xdo/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/bid-protest/the-court-of-federal-claims-opens-its-doors-to-protests-of-civilian-task-and-delivery-order-procurements/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Bid Protest</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Delivery Order</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Tucker Act</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:17:52 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Sarah Gleich</dc:creator>
      
      <description>In June I wrote about GAO&amp;rsquo;s conclusion that its protest jurisdiction over agency task and delivery order procurements will not only continue after the May 27, 2011 sunset date, but will expand.&amp;nbsp;At that time, I noted that, to the extent the Court of Federal Claims agreed with GAO&amp;rsquo;s...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/6f8b-z84xdo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/bid-protest/the-court-of-federal-claims-opens-its-doors-to-protests-of-civilian-task-and-delivery-order-procurements/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>ABA to Host Webinar on Impact of Stanford v. Roche</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/we4-8ncL-Nw/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/intellectual-property/aba-to-host-webinar-on-impact-of-stanford-v-roche/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Bayh-Dole Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Intellectual Property</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:16:18 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>John E. McCarthy, Jr.</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On September 28, 2011, I will be participating in an American Bar Association webinar to discuss the impact of the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s June, 2011, decision in Stanford v. Roche. In Stanford v. Roche, the Supreme Court upheld a Federal Circuit decision finding that under the Bayh-Dole Act, a...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/we4-8ncL-Nw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/intellectual-property/aba-to-host-webinar-on-impact-of-stanford-v-roche/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>OMB Establishes New Policy of Accelerated Payments to Small Business Contractors But Will It Work?</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/97y4NgF2QqY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/small-business-1/omb-establishes-new-policy-of-accelerated-payments-to-small-business-contractors-but-will-it-work/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">OMB</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Prompt Payment Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Small Business</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:00:47 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Gunjan R. Talati</dc:creator>
      
      <description>A memorandum issued by the Office of Management and Budget on Wednesday, September 14, 2011, establishes a new Executive Branch policy that agencies should pay small business government contractors within 15 days of receiving proper invoicing documents.&amp;nbsp;Currently, agencies are required to pay...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/97y4NgF2QqY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/small-business-1/omb-establishes-new-policy-of-accelerated-payments-to-small-business-contractors-but-will-it-work/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Mandatory Display of Fraud Posters</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/n-QILzZg-NA/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/ethics-compliance/mandatory-display-of-fraud-posters/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Ethics &amp; Compliance</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:55:40 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Peter J. Eyre</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On September 16, 2011, DoD issued a final rule&amp;nbsp;that requires contractors to prominently display fraud hotline posters prepared by the DoD Office of the Inspector General. These posters must be displayed in common work areas within business segments performing work on DoD contracts. The current...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/n-QILzZg-NA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/ethics-compliance/mandatory-display-of-fraud-posters/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Proposal To Further Limit Executive Branch Employees' Acceptance Of Gifts From Lobbyists</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/wsG_I_pQks4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/ethics-compliance/proposal-to-further-limit-executive-branch-employees-acceptance-of-gifts-from-lobbyists/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">Ethics &amp; Compliance</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:47:29 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Peter J. Eyre</dc:creator>
      
      <description>On September 13, 2011, the Office of Government Ethics proposed amendments&amp;nbsp;to the regulation governing the acceptance of gifts by executive branch employees. The purpose of the amendments is to (a) implement the lobbyist gift ban already applicable, by Executive Order of the President, to most...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/wsG_I_pQks4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/ethics-compliance/proposal-to-further-limit-executive-branch-employees-acceptance-of-gifts-from-lobbyists/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>C&amp;M Publishes Article in BNA Federal Contracts Report on Recent Supreme Court Holding that FOIA Response Falls Within FCA Public Disclosure Bar</title>
         
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~3/5Nq3TcZwNEE/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/false-claims/cm-publishes-article-in-bna-federal-contracts-report-on-recent-supreme-court-holding-that-foia-response-falls-within-fca-public-disclosure-bar/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">FOIA</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/articles">False Claims</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/">Featured</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Freedom of Information Act</category><category domain="http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/tags">Schindler Elevator</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:11:51 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Mana Elihu Lombardo</dc:creator>
      
      <description>The Freedom of Information Act (&amp;ldquo;FOIA&amp;rdquo;), 5 U.S.C. &amp;sect;552, is intended to uphold the principles of transparency and open government, so that citizens can assess government accountability and actions. Since its enactment in 1966, FOIA has also been used by companies to obtain...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovernmentContractsLegalForum/~4/5Nq3TcZwNEE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.governmentcontractslegalforum.com/2011/09/articles/false-claims/cm-publishes-article-in-bna-federal-contracts-report-on-recent-supreme-court-holding-that-foia-response-falls-within-fca-public-disclosure-bar/</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

