Equid Blog

Rabid Horse In Texas

Scott Weese — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:04:00 -0500

A rabid horse has been identified in Bandera County, Texas - this is the first case of rabies in a Texas horse in almost 40 years. The horse started acting strangely, erratically and at times violently. Rabies was eventually diagnosed (diagnosis involves testing the brain after the horse dies or is euthanized) and the owners are undergoing post-exposure treatment.

Rabies is a rare disease in horses, but there is always a risk of exposure in regions where rabies is present in wildlife. The fact that equine rabies is rare is a good thing, but it can also breed complacency and lead to decreased vaccination rates.

Decreasing vaccination is a bad thing. Vaccination is cheap insurance for a very serious disease. Rabies is invariably fatal in horses. It's also a risk to anyone around the horse. Transmission of rabies from horses to people is theoretically possible through bites or other contacts that result in introduction of saliva into wounds, cuts or possibly the mouth, nose or eyes. I'm not aware of any documented cases of equine-to-human transmission of rabies, but given the severity of rabies, we need to be careful. Additionally, rabid horses have killed people because they can be unpredictable and aggressive. Based on all these factors, it's important that we not become complacent about rabies in horses, and a key component of rabies control is vaccination. However, vaccination is not the only aspect of rabies control. Using various management practices to reduce the risk of wildlife exposure and controlling rabies in wildlife in the area are other important measures, but individual horse owners can have the greatest impact on their horses' health by ensuring they are properly vaccinated against rabies.

If you own a horse, make sure it's vaccinated against rabies unless you live in a rabies-free region. More information about rabies in horses is available on the equIDblog Resources page.

Image source: www.bbc.co.uk

6 Good Parasite Tips

Scott Weese — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:15:00 -0500

TheHorse.com has a good article about deworming, which includes six good parasite-fighting tips from Dr. Craig Reinemeyer. Check out the full article for all the details. Here are the key points and some comments:

1. Stop focusing on the wrong things

It's easy for people to get hung up on a few concepts or topics and not see the big picture or the real problems. We need to think in terms of the horse(s), not the parasites. We're trying to optimize horse health. That doesn't necessarily mean killing all parasites, nor does it mean relying soley on drugs to control them. Conceptually, we need to think about parasite control, not just deworming.

2. Plan parasite control around parasite biology, not a calendar

There is no "standard" deworming program. Every program needs to be tailored to the geographic region, farm and horse. What happens here is Ontario is very different from what happens in Florida in terms of parasites. For example, the risk of transmission in horses turned out on pasture in Florida in February is certainly different from those turned out in snowy fields in Ontario at the same time of year. Even in the same region, what happens on one farm may be very different than what happens on another. When designing a parasite control program, you need to consider what is going on with worms in the horses and in the environment to determine the optimal approach.

3. Don't encourage resistant parasites

Most people know antibiotic-resistant bacteria are a bad thing, but often concerns about anti-parasitic resistance are ignored. We only have a limited number of antiparasitic drugs, and there aren't many more coming in the near future. Heavy use or misuse creates an environment where resistance may emerge. It's being seen with certain bugs and certain drugs, and needs to be taken seriously - now.

4. Don't treat all horses the same

As I mentioned above, you need to tailor parasite control to something that is relevant for the region, farm and horse. Different horses are at different risks of exposure. Some horses are naturally more resistant to parasites, so these animals don't need to be (and indeed shouldn't be) treated the same as more susceptible horses. Deworming should be tailored to the needs of the individual horse. Yes, it takes more effort and some thought, but it's worth it.

5. Practice evidence-based parasite control

That means use all available information to make decisions. It includes knowing what parasites are a concern on the farm (which requires testing), what antiparasitic drugs have been effective on the farm (which requires testing to determine treatment success), an understanding of farm management practices, and information from research about deworming strategies and drugs. Performing fecal egg counts is a critical component of this, and something that is not done nearly enough.

6. Be prepared to change

Something that works today may not work in the future. You can't get stuck in your ways and assume that since something worked in the past, it will always work.

Image source: www.ponytalesblog.com

Alcohol Wipe Before Injection?

Scott Weese — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:29:00 -0500

It's common for people to wipe injection sites in horses with alcohol before inserting the needle. It's so ingrained into some peoples' minds that they may complain if their veterinarian doesn't use an alcohol wipe before injecting. But what does that little swab really do, and is it needed?

Alcohol is a disinfectant and can kill many (but not all) bacteria and viruses. Therefore, wiping an injection site with alcohol could theoretically reduce bacterial counts and maybe reduce the risk of an injection site infection. However, alcohol does not work well in the presence of organic debris (i.e. dirt), and may not (and likely won't in most cases) penetrate through a horse's haircoat down to the skin. The best aspect of alcohol is some situations is wetting down the hair to help see the area you're injecting (for example, when visualizing the vein for an intravenous injection).

The risk of injection site infection is very low in the average horse, and the true benefit of wiping the site with alcohol is unknown. There is no clear evidence that this practice reduces infections. The most serious injection-associated infection, clostridial myonecrosis, is caused by either inoculation of clostridial spores (which are resistant to alcohol) or by spores that are dormant in the muscle tissue. In either case, wiping the skin with alcohol won't help prevent it.

Bottom line: There's no evidence that alcohol wiping is needed, or useful. There's also no reason not to do it, so it's really a matter of personal preference. Not using alcohol wipes is not an indication of poor practice, but a lot of people will use them on the chance that they are effective, knowing that at worst they will do no harm.

More information about clostridial myonecrosis can be found on the equIDblog Resources page.

Helicobacter Testing For Horses

Scott Weese — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:29:00 -0500

I've had a run of questions about testing for Helicobacter in horses with gastric (i.e. stomach) ulcers. Helicobacter pylori is unquestionably an important problem and clear cause of gastric ulcers in people. However, people aren't horses. The human stomach differs greatly from the equine stomach, and gastric ulcers in people are much different than gastric ulcers in horses. There is no (I repeat, NO) evidence that Helicobacter is a cause of ulcers in horses. Despite this some unscrupulous molecular diagnostic companies offer unvalidated tests for Helicobacter in horses, for reasons that make absolutely no sense.

Don't waste your money on Helicobacter testing if your horse has ulcers. Spend it on treatment and management changes to reduce the risks of ulcers recurring.

(click image for source)

Review Of CEM and Implications For Canada

Maureen Anderson — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:00:00 -0500

Hard to believe that the whole conundrum about contagious equine metritis (CEM) that is still affecting the Canadian equine industry started a little bit more than a year ago, when a Quarter Horse stud in Kentucky tested positive for the causative agent, Taylorella equigenitalis. Tracing the contacts of that stud lead to the quarantine and testing of 990 horses in 40 states, as well as 19 mares in Canada, including 9 in Ontario. Out of 274 exposed stallions, 22 were ultimately found to be positive, none of which had any detectable clinical signs that they were infected, meaning if they hadn’t been tested, they may have kept on going about their business breeding – and possibly infecting – mares for years to come. The rest of the exposed horses were mares, five of which turned out to be infected. One particularly interesting fact was that four of these mares had been bred by artificial insemination - previous to this it was thought that CEM was only readily transmissible by live cover from an infected stud, not via semen shipped in a straw.

Thankfully all of the Canadian mares were negative, but unfortunately the Canadian equine industry is still suffering the consequences of what has happened to our close southern neighbour. Fourteen countries have increased import requirements for Canadian (and obviously US) horses in terms of CEM testing, and another major blow was the loss of Canada’s low-risk status with the UK's Horserace Betting Levy Board (HBLB).

Canada must maintain strict import requirements for horses to prevent CEM from getting into the country. Most of the horses imported into Canada come from CEM-positive countries, and it’s getting more difficult to argue not including the US on that list as well. The risk is constantly present, and remaining diligent about quarantine and testing – and rules like ensuring horses are not on antibiotics for some other reason when they’re cultured – is key. Semen import restrictions for semen coming from the US to Canada will stand for 2010. While this certainly causes a headache for breeders, requiring an import permit and a health certificate for the stud stating that it has not stood on a CEM-quarantined farm, is it enough to protect Canadian horses? The next step would be to require all studs to be tested for CEM before their semen can be imported to Canada. That is no small request. Testing a stud involves culturing the stud himself, and then having him test-breed two mares which then also need to be culture-negative. Anecdotally the entire process can cost in the neighbourhood of $5-7K per horse, which at the moment all needs to be borne by the horse owner. That gives you some idea of what an enormous undertaking it was to quarantine and test 274 exposed stallions during last year’s outbreak.

In the US, 87% of exposed horses have now been cleared, and there have been no new positives in the last 8 months. However, there are still 17 states where there are quarantined farms. There is talk of voluntary testing of over 2000 studs in the US in 2010, as well as targeted surveillance of stallions imported in the last 10 years and those standing at large AI centers. Only time will tell if these extra efforts will serve to calm the fears of countries that are now hesitant to import horses and semen from the US, or whether they will reveal more cases of CEM and confirm the fears that CEM may have unknowingly become endemic in the US in the past decade.

More information on CEM is available in our archives.

This blog is based on a presentation by Dr. Tracey Chenier, a theriogenologist and faculty member at the Ontario Veterinary Collge, given at the recent 2010 Ontario Veterinary Medical Association Conference.

Photo credit: David Campbell (click for source)

Strangles And Disinfection

Scott Weese — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:30:00 -0500

Often, when someone calls and asks about management of strangles, one of the first questions is "What disinfectant should I use?"

There are basically two answers that I give:

1) Streptococcus equi, the cause of strangles, is susceptible to most disinfectants, provided they are used properly. That means using them at the proper concentration, providing the recommended contact time (5-30 minutes, depending on the disinfectant) and ensuring that there is minimal organic debris (e.g. dirt, manure, pus) present on the surface to be disinfected. The latter is a key point, as disinfectants do not work well in the presence of debris, so it's therefore understandably very difficult to really disinfect a stable. Some stable surfaces (e.g. sealed solid walls and floors, buckets) are able to be disinfected if it is done properly, while other surfaces (e.g. dirt floors, unsealed wood walls, leather) are essentially impossible to disinfect.

2) Disinfection is a very minor component of strangles control. It is something to pay attention to and it should be done properly, but too often people to focus on disinfection as the key infection control measure. Just disinfecting surfaces, but ignoring aspects like cohorting exposed and unexposed horses, restricting horse movement, testing for carriers, regular temperature checks of all horses to detect early cases, using good personal hygiene and using protective outerwear, is bound to fail in terms of controlling an outbreak.

So, don't ignore cleaning and disinfection, but don't' rely on it as the main component of strangles control.

More information about strangles can be found on the equIDblog Resources page.

2008 Australian Hendra Virus Recap

Scott Weese — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:35:00 -0500

The latest edition of the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases contains a paper describing the 2008 Australian Hendra virus outbreak in horses and people.

In this outbreak, there were five horses infected and two humans infected. The horses predominantly had signs of neurological disease, not respiratory disease like some other reports describing this disease. Four horses died. One recovered but was euthanized for public health reasons.

Two people became infected after working with the sick horses, which represents 10% of the total veterinary staff that were exposed to the infected horses. Both people started off with influenza-like illness, which seemed to improve initially, but then signs of severe neurological disease developed. They were treated with ribavirin, an antiviral drug, as part of an experimental treatment. One of them died after 40 days of illness, the other person survived.

The authors stressed that the effectiveness of ribavirin could not be determined, but they recommend it nonetheless because of the severity of Hendra virus infection and lack of other options. Ribavirin was also used in the 2009 outbreak, but it is clearly not 100% effective since one person died there also.

A number of concerning activities occurred that put people at risk of infection, including a "percutaneous blood exposure while euthanizing an infected horses" (they didn't explain exactly what this was, but it could have been a needlestick), low use of personal protective equipment, and contact with potentially infectious body fluids. This is unfortunately not surprising since the approach to infection control (particularly in terms of zoonotic infections) is often lax in equine medicine. That certainly has to change, particularly in areas where Hendra virus may be present.

Much more information about how to control this potentially devastating virus is needed. Fortunately, infections are uncommon and it is restricted to a fairly small geographic range in Queensland, Australia.

Image source: http://animalphotos.info/

Equine Infectious Anemia In Britain

Scott Weese — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:42:00 -0500

Equine infectious anemia (EIA) virus, a chronic and potentially devastating bloodborne virus, was identified in two horses in Britain. The two affected horses were from a group of horses imported from Romania via Belgium. They were tested as part of standard import testing regulations designed to do exactly what happened here - diagnose this important infectious disease at the time of importation so that the infected horses cannot spread the disease in the country. The two positive horses will be euthanized, the unfortunate but standard response to this virus, because infected horses can pose a risk of infection to other horses for their entire lives. Other horses on the premises are under quarantine and are likely being tested further. The risk of transmission to other horses during the presumably short period of time they've been on the farm is probably low because, as an insect borne disease, biting fly activity has probably been pretty low during the cold British winter weather. (Transmission by sharing needles or other human-associated ways of cross-contamination of blood is also a concern, and has been a problem in other outbreaks.)

Chief veterinary officer Nigel Gibbens stated that these are the first imported cases of EIA identified since 1976. This is a good example of why we need to continue routine infection control measures such as import testing, even when nothing is found for years. Some people try to argue that since certain problems don't seem to be present, or at least are not identified, that infection control testing or activities should be decreased. This situation illustrates why that's bad thinking. Despite only picking up one incident in the past 34 years, this is a very important finding - failure to detect the positive horses could have lead to widespread infection in the country, which would ultimately make it very difficult and expensive to try to control. You never know when the next outbreak is lurking around the corner, and complacency is a big enemy of infection control.

Image source: www.collectgbstamps.co.uk

Bare Feet And Horse Bugs

Scott Weese — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:47:00 -0500

I assume that people wouldn't voluntarily and regularly walk around barefoot on dog feces (or feces of any type), yet it's perplexing that some people regularly clean out horse stalls in bare feet (I've seen it done!). While horse manure may not be as inherently gross as dog poop, it's still feces, and like all feces contains a huge population of various bacteria, some of which can be harmful. The risks of barefoot mucking may also extend to bare feet inside boots, although I don't think sock-averse people need to panic.

An article in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases (Friederichs et al) describes infectious arthritis of the shoulder of a horse owner that was caused by Streptococcus zooepidemicus, a bacterium commonly found in horses but rarely associated with disease in people. The person didn't have a wound in the shoulder area or any other obvious route for the bacterium to get to the shoulder joint. They searched for a source of the infection and all they found was a chronic lesion on the person's foot. This, combined with the patient's history of taking care of his horses in "bare feet in boots", led them to implicate the foot as the source of infection.

The idea, I guess, is that socks would be a barrier to help prevent contamination of the foot wound. That makes sense to a degree - the person could contaminate his foot with S. zooepidemicus from his hands (probably acquired from touching the horse's nose) while removing the boots, or manure could work its way into boots and directly contaminate the wound. Both are possible, but we have to be a little cautious in interpreting these conclusions. However, this is a bacterium that is associated with horses and the foot lesion is certainly a possible route of entry.

Overall, this should be considered an interesting report of a very rare problem, not something that indicates a major concern. However, there are a few good points to take away from this story:

If you have a wound or chronic lesion of any sort, make sure you take measures to reduce the risk of bacterial contamination when working around horses. This might be as simple as making sure it's covered by clothing, or something more involved like using an impermeable bandage.
Hands are probably the major source of infection transmission, and good hand hygiene is important after horse or stall contact, particularly if you have an underlying disease.

This equIDblog entry was originally posted on our sister site, Worms & Germs Blog, on 20-Jan-10.

Case: Antibiotic-Induced Diarrhea

Maureen Anderson — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:35:00 -0500

A three-year-old Standardbred gelding was presented to the hospital for evaluation and treatment of diarrhea (colitis). The previous week the horse had developed a mild hind-limb lameness which seemed to come and go, and it was decided to treat the horse with antibiotics “just in case” it had something to do with an infection. The horse was treated with ceftiofur (an antibiotic, often sold under the brand name Excenel or Naxcel) for five days. On the fifth day, the gelding developed moderate to severe diarrhea. The next morning the horse also had a fever. He was treated with anti-inflammatories and quickly referred to the hospital for intensive care.

On presentation, the gelding was very quiet. He had a very high heart rate, reddish gums and he was significantly dehydrated. Intestinal sounds could not be heard over the abdomen, indicating that the horse’s intestines were not moving normally, and there was a “ping” on the right side of the abdomen, indicating that there was gas accumulating in the cecum (part of the large intestine). Treatment with intravenous (IV) fluids was started right away to try to correct the dehydration and keep up with the amount of fluid the horse was losing in its diarrhea.

By the next morning the horse’s attitude was improved, but his gums were still an abnormal colour (“toxic mucous membranes”, see picture), indicating that there were inflammatory cytokines (substances released by cells when they’re in distress) and likely bacterial toxins in horse’s bloodstream. Also, despite the IV fluids, the gelding was still dehydrated, likely because he was pooling fluid from his body tissues in his intestine, as well as the more obvious loss of fluid in his ongoing diarrhea. This went on for another two days, despite intensive treatment in the hospital. On the fourth day, the gelding developed severe signs of colic. His large colon became progressively more distended with gas, and the contents of his small intestine started to back-up into his stomach. His heart rate became extremely high, and his pain could not be controlled with sedatives or anti-inflammatories. A belly-tap yielded a red-tinged fluid (normally belly fluid is light yellow), and the concern at that point was that the intestines had become twisted (which can happen in horses with diarrhea as a result of their abnormal intestinal motility). Despite the risks, it was decided to take the horse to surgery - but there was no twist in the bowel. The cause of the colic was that the large colon was severely distended with gas and fluid, and it was barely moving at all. The appearance of the large colon was consistent with extreme inflammation, and the tip of the cecum looked so bad that the surgeons decided to remove it because it was likely dead or dying.

The horse recovered from anesthesia, and IV fluid therapy was continued. Later that day, when the horse was offered some pellets, some intestinal sounds were detectable. The horse soon started to pass diarrhea again, but overall his attitude was much brighter, and his hydration status and (remarkably) blood protein levels remained stable.

Unfortunately the day after surgery the gelding became reluctant to move around the stall. Increased digital pulses were detected on the front feet, and the horse was sensitive to hoof testers – the gelding was developing laminitis. Despite additional treatment, the signs of laminitis became worse and worse. In the end the horse was euthanized, less than a week after being admitted to the hospital.

On necropsy, the entire large colon was severely thickened, filled with green-yellow fluid, and the mucosa (inside surface of the intestine) was ulcerated. Signs of severe acute laminitis were present in all four feet. A specific causative agent of the colitis could not be identified – tests for Salmonella and clostridial toxins were all negative. This is not too surprising as no agent is identified in over half of all adult horse colitis/diarrhea cases. But there is no doubt what set this terrible chain of events in motion – treatment with antibiotics, for a condition that may or may not have ever required antibiotic treatment in the first place.

We talk a lot about antibiotic-induced colitis/diarrhea in horses, but until you’ve seen it for yourself, it can be hard to believe that drugs used every day in both people and animals can have such a devastating effect on a horse. Antibiotics certainly do save lives, but unfortunately there are no “miracle cures” that are entirely without drawbacks. This case clearly demonstrates one of the most important reasons why we so strongly advocate prudent use of antibiotics in horses – their use should never be employed lightly. Although this is a “worst case scenario” that overall occurs uncommonly, the potential is there and should always be taken into consideration.

Photo credit: M. Anderson 2007

How To Approach Rabies Exposure In Horses

Scott Weese — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:27:00 -0500

I received newsletter today from Intervet (a pharmaceutical company) that is targeted at equine veterinarians. One article discussed rabies in horses. It wasn't bad overall, but I thought the section on what to do when a horse might have been exposed to rabies was worth discussing.

The article asks, "If your client suspects that a horse has been bitten by a rabies-infected animal, what should be done?"

Answer: "Contacting you as the veterinarian is always the first step."

Great first step. A second step that wasn't mentioned should be, "Try to identify and (safely) capture the animal that bit the horse." This is often impossible but certainly worthwhile if it can be done. However, if you're trying to catch the offending animal, make sure you don't put yourself at risk of exposure to rabies in the process. If the animal can be caught, it's rabies status at the time of the bite can be determined (either through testing or quarantine). If it can be shown that the animal wasn't rabid, a lot of stress, hassle and expense can be saved.

"If the horse was previously vaccinated... Then isolate and observe the animal for 45 to 90 days (your clinical evaluation will involve gait analysis, radiography and a spinal tap)."

Boosting the rabies vaccine is also a good idea. The next step, however, needs to be contacting local regulatory officials to find out what you have to do. They determine if, how and how long an animal needs to be quarantined - this is NOT the decision of the local veterinarian nor the animal's owner. Most likely, they will recommend a 45 day quarantine for a vaccinated horse, since this is what is recommended in the NASPHV Compendium on Rabies. The discussion of diagnostic testing makes no sense. There is absolutely no indication to perform diagnostic tests on a horse that has been bitten by a rabies suspect. None. There are no tests that can be used to diagnose rabies in live horses (also exposed horses don't instantly develop signs of rabies). Horses should be monitored closely for signs of rabies during the quarantine period, but that's it.

"...and have the client make a list of all people who had contact with the horse."

This is often done when horses have or are suspected of having rabies, but not horses that are potentially exposed. It is done to help public health personnel contact people that may have been exposed to rabies. A horse that was just bitten by an animal is not a risk for transmission of rabies. (However, keeping a list of people who have contact with the horse after it's been bitten (i.e. durng the quarantine period) - which should be as short a list as possible - is a reasonable precaution in the unlikely event that the horse does develop rabies.)

"If the animal was not vaccinated, your options are to euthanize and perform a postmortem examination of the brain (the only way to definitely confirm rabies)..."

Euthanasia is one of the options that needs to be considered in an unvaccinated horse that has been exposed, which is one of the reasons that identifying the biting animal and testing it is critical, if it can be done. The last part of the above sentence (from the atricle) is complete nonsense. Why would you test the brain of a normal horse that has been euthanized because it's just been bitten by a potentially rabid animal? The horse isn't being euthanized because it has rabies, it's being euthanized because of the likelihood of it developing rabies weeks to months later. Testing of the brain will tell you absolutely nothing if the animal was only bitten recently.

"...or isolate and observe the horse for six months and develop the human contact list."

Again, this needs to be decided based on discussions with regulatory personnel who are responsible for dictating what is to be done. A six-month quarantine is a pretty standard recommendation for an unvaccinated animal. Creating a human contact list should not be necessary, since quarantine involves severely restricting contact of people with the horse and only a few (ideally one) person would have any type of contact.

The article wraps up with the very true emphasis on vaccinating horses. It's a cheap measure to prevent a relatively rare but invariably fatal disease.

Click image for source.

Piroplasmosis In New Mexico

Scott Weese — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:51:00 -0500

At some point, the US is going to have to admit that piroplasmosis, the bloodborne parasitic infection caused by Theileria equi, is endemic in some regions of the country. It's a declaration that will have major impacts on horse movement to some areas but, it's better for everyone to know what's going on. Piroplasmosis is technically still considered an exotic disease in the US, but there have been many cases identified over the past year and a clear source for the individual outbreaks in lacking, indicating there must be a reservoir in some part(s) of the country.

The latest incident involves the diagnosis of piroplasmosis in three race horses in New Mexico, which were picked up as part of routine screening. There were only three positives out of about 1200 horses tested, so the disease is still rare, but the fact that it was there and none of the positive horses had any link with previous outbreaks is definitely a concern. The OIE report states that transmission is suspected to have been from "artificial" means like sharing needles between horses, not natural tick transmission. This could account for the multiple horses affected but doesn't explain where the disease came from it the first place, and it's unclear how solid that hypothesis really is.

It's quite interesting (surprising, frustrating...) that few comments are put forth in any of these outbreaks indicating where the infections may have originated and why we are seeing recurrent, unrelated infections. Is increased testing in different areas helping to pick up cases that would otherwise have been missed (i.e. were already there), or is piroplasmosis in the US an emerging problem? How confident are they that there are no ticks capable of transmitting T. equi in some of these areas? Is wider screening of horses required to determine the extent of the problem and to determine whether it can be controlled? Is broader screening of ticks in the affected areas needed to see if there are ticks known to be able to transmit T. equi? Are studies needed of other tick species in areas where unexplained cases have occurred to determine if some tick species that are not currently known to be able to spread the parasite can actually do so? Lots of questions... hopefully someone's trying to find some answers.

Click image for source.

Equine Infectious Anemia In New Jersey

Scott Weese — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:40:00 -0500

A pony in New Jersey has been diagnosed with equine infectious anemia (EIA) and euthanized. Details are pretty scarce at this point and it's unclear whether the pony was sick or whether EIA was simply diagnosed through routine testing. There's also no indication of where the pony might have acquired the infection, which is a very important question.

Equine infectious anemia is a viral disease of horses and other equids that is characterized by recurrent fever, lethargy, decreased appetite and decreased red blood cell numbers (anemia). Sometimes, the first episode of disease (acute EIA) can be fatal, but most horses recover. Most survivors experience recurrent episodes of illness. In some horses, these episodes become frequent and severe.

A major problem with EIA is that horses are infected (and are infectious) for life. Even if they recover from the acute disease and rarely or never get noticeable recurrent disease, they are still carrying the virus in their blood. Biting flies are the main means of transmission from horse-to-horse, although human-associated transmission through reuse of needles or other procedures that cross-contaminate blood between horses can also be involved.

The combination of life-long infection and an insect vector is BAD. That's why, in areas where EIA is not endemic, infected horses are usually immediately euthanized. In some regions, affected horses can be branded or tattooed to permanently indicate their EIA status and housed at least 200 yards from any other horse (and often with strict insect control measures).

Control of EIA focuses on identification of carriers. Most jurisdictions require regular EIA testing (formerly the "Coggins test") for horses that are traveling or competing, as well as imported horses. While this disease is extremely rare and the vast majority of routine tests are negative, it's a disease that can silently spread in a population if people are not looking for it - routine testing is critical for keeping this disease at bay.

Umbilical Care In Foals

Scott Weese — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:26:00 -0500

As foaling season approaches, it's a good idea for people to review proper umbilical care. The umbilicus is an important route of infection in foals, and can be associated with problems including local umbilical abscesses, large abdominal abscesses extending to the liver, and overwhelming body-wide infection (sepsis). The reason the umbilicus is such a critical structure is that it contains three major blood vessels (two arteries and one large vein) and the urachus (which connects the umbilical cord to the foal's bladder) . When the umbilicus ruptures shortly after birth, these structures are exposed to the bacteria-laden environment of the outside world and can be a route of entry for local and deep infections. Care of the umbilicus during the initial high-risk period is a key part of raising a healthy foal.

Do all foal's need specific umbilical care? Not really. Most foals, especially those born normally in a clean environment to a healthy mare and who received adequate colostrum, don't need anything done. However, it's not always easy to differentiate these low-risk foals from others, and it is possible for the healthiest foal born in the cleanest environment with ingestion of an adequate volume of good quality colostrum to develop complications, so most people perform some form of post-birth umbilical care (and that's a good thing). The key is making sure that it's the right umbilical care.

The goals of umbilical care are pretty basic:

Prevent bacteria from entering the umbilicus.
Avoid damaging the umbilicus and other body tissues, and avoid delaying normal drying of the umbilicus.

What to use?

Research has indicated that a 0.5% chlorhexidine solution is the optimal umbilical dip. Other disinfectants can also kill local bacteria on the umbilicus but may not be as effective, may not work as well in the presence of debris (dirt, manure...), or may be irritating to body tissues.

Read the label:

Make sure you are actually using 0.5% chlorhexidine and that it's a solution (diluted in water), not a tincture (diluted in alcohol). If you don't have 0.5% chlorhexidine solution and are unsure about how to dilute it properly, ask your veterinarian.

More is not better!

Don't think that since 0.5% is good, 5% must be 10 times better. The stronger the concentration, the greater the chance of damage to local tissues, which can increase the risk of complications. Stick with 0.5%.

More is not better! Part 2

The umbilicus should be dipped in disinfectant, not marinaded in it! The goal is to cover the umbilicus and not other tissues (e.g. the abdominal wall). You don't need to soak the umbilicus or hold the disinfectant in place over it. Short term contact (dip) is adequate. Dip it and walk away. The umbilicus needs to dry up - repeated soaking isn't helpful.

More is not better! Part 3

The umbilicus should be disinfected shortly after birth, then every 6-8 hours for the first 24 hours of life. That's usually enough. If the umbilicus still appears wet at that time, it can be dipped again. Continued dipping "just is case" is not needed.

Don't tie off the umbilicus:

Tying off the umbilicus can actually increase the risk of complications such as infection and patent urachus (urination through the umbilicus).

Hands off!

Don't touch, poke or otherwise make contact with the umbilicus with your hands. It's not needed and it's a great way of transferring bacteria to the umbilicus.

If in doubt, call your veterinarian:

A proactive call to your veterinarian is much better and cheaper than an umbilical infection, umbilical abscess, septic foal or patent urachus. These are all expensive complications and often difficult to treat successfully. Foals can change very quickly, and waiting to "see what happens" for a day or two can be the difference between a minor complication and a life-threatening problem.

Case Presentation: Chronic Weight Loss

Maureen Anderson — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:00:00 -0500

An eight-year-old Quarter Horse gelding was presented for examination due to chronic weight loss over several months. Lately he’d also been lying down frequently and exhibiting increased breathing effort, so he was treated for what was suspected to be mild signs of colic, but failed to improve. He’d also collapsed once during mild exercise.

On examination, the gelding was quiet, alert and otherwise physically normal except for his poor body condition. However, on rectal palpation there was a large, firm, non-painful mass within the caudo-dorsal (i.e. upper rear) abdomen. revealed a large (42 centimeter) firm mass in the caudo-dorsal abdomen. The mass was further evaluated using ultrasound via the rectum. the mass was multi-lobulated (i.e. made up of many pockets on the inside) and had a large blood supply. It did not appear that the mass was directly attached to or growing in any abdominal organs (e.g. kidneys, intestine). Blood work showed a high white blood cell count (mature neutrophilia), moderate anemia, and high protein levels due to an abnormal increase in globulins (hyperglobulinemia).

These findings were highly suggestive of a large abdominal abscess, but a cancerous mass could not yet be ruled out. It was decided to take the horse to surgery the next day in order to better evaluate the mass, collect samples and remove it if possible. In surgery, the mass was found to be right at the root of the intestinal mesentery (the large membrane that carries the blood supply to the intestines), and there were a large number of adhesions between the mass and the base of the cecum, as well as to some loops of the small intestine. A needle and syringe were used to remove a sample of the mass’s contents in a sterile manner. The fluid retrieved had the appearance of thick pus, which further supported the tentative diagnosis of an abscess. Unfortunately, due to the location and size of the mass, as well as the number and size of adhesions, it could not be safely removed. The horse was therefore euthanized while still under anesthesia.

Necropsy examination confirmed that the mass was an abscess. The capsule of the abscess was extremely thick and tough, indicating that it had been developing over a very long period of time. A long-standing abscess such as this explained all of the gelding’s clinical signs – weight loss and moderate anemia due to chronic disease, high globulin levels due to constant stimulation of immune cells by the infectious focus, and recumbency and collapse due to discomfort caused by entanglement of the intestines in the adhesions associated with the abscess.

Culture of the fluid sample retrieved at surgery yielded a heavy, pure culture of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi – the bacterium that causes strangles. This horse had what’s known as “bastard strangles,” which is a recognized complication that occurs occasionally in horses that have had the classic upper respiratory infection. In these cases the S. equi invade beyond the respiratory tract and can end up anywhere in the body. Then, just as the bacterium does in the lymph nodes around the head and throat in classic cases, the S. equi can form abscesses. The abscesses may form in internal lymph nodes (which is likely what happened with this gelding) or in organs like the kidneys or even the brain. These abscesses tend to develop slowly and insidiously. Even if they can be identified, they are typically extremely difficult to treat effectively, and unfortunately euthanasia is often the end result. Other bacteria that can cause similar abscesses include Rhodococcus equi, Corynebacterium spp. and Arcanobacterium pyogenes.

Strangles is endemic in the horse population – whenever horses are mixed or brought together in large groups there is a risk of strangles transmission. We cannot eliminate the risk, but we can try to reduce it as much as possible using basic infectious disease control measures. More information about strangles is available on the equIDblog Resources page and in our archives.

Image: A Standardbred in poor body condition due to chronic debilitation as a result of large abdominal abscess, similar to the case described here (photo credit: M. Anderson).

Why Can't We Eradicate Equine Herpesvirus?

Scott Weese — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:00:00 -0500

Eradication of infectious diseases is a great goal, but it's rarely practical. The best known (and perhaps only) example of infectious disease eradication is the elimination of smallpox. So, why is it so hard to do?

The following general criteria need to be in place to eradicate a disease:

It must have a clearly defined host range and that range is ideally only one species. A disease that can affect multiple species is very hard to control.
It must predictably cause disease in individuals that are infected.
There must be no long-term carriage state. Once a person/animal gets over the illness, he/she/it must get rid of the infection completely in a defined and predictable period of time.
A highly effective vaccine should be available.
There must be a commitment to put in lots of time, money and effort everywhere the disease exists.

This isn't the case with most diseases, and equine herpesvirus (EHV) has many characteristics that make eradication impossible:

Unpredictable disease: EHV infection doesn't always cause signs of disease. When it does cause disease the signs can be quite variable and difficult to easily differentiate from other infections.
Longterm carriage: This is the biggest problem with herpesviruses. EHV is able to survive in a latent (dormant) state in the body after infection. It can lie dormant for a long period of time, but infected animals can always start shedding the virus again. A large percentage of horses are carrying EHV in their bodies and there's no way to get rid of it.
Vaccine: Vaccines are available but they are by no means 100% effective at preventing infection.
Time, effort, money and cooperation are terms that are not commonly associated with disease control in horses. Getting everyone to follow a standard recommendation (if one were able to control disease) would be difficult to impossible. The entire horse-owning population would not be willing to spend the money for broad control measures, and there's no real impetus for governments to do so. Even getting people to agree to follow basic vaccination and infection control recommendations is difficult. If there is any negative impact on use of horses, ease of management or any other minor inconvenience, 100% compliance with any recommendation becomes impossible to obtain.

We have to live with EHV. It will always be a risk to horses. Good infection control measures and vaccination of certain groups (e.g. pregnant mares) can help control the impact of the virus.

H1N1 Influenza And Horses

Scott Weese — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:40:00 -0500

A colleague mentioned a rumour that is apparently going around some areas about horses getting H1N1 influenza. While we never say never with infectious diseases, there is no evidence that H1N1 can be spread to horses, nor do I have much concern about this. H1N1 can infect different species, including humans, pigs, poultry, cats, ferrets and dogs. That's a pretty impressive range, but it's mostly because the virus is made up of genes from human, swine and avian influenza viruses, and we know that other species like ferrets and cats are prone to occasionally (rarely) catching human or avian influenza. Horses have their own influenza, H3N8 equine influenza A. This virus has been remarkably stable in the horse population in that H3N8 has been the predominant equine influenza strain for a long time. There is little information indicating that horses are susceptible to the variety of seasonal flu viruses that circulate amongst the human population every year, or H5N1 avian influenza. No one has specifically tested H1N1on horses, and equine infections are not theoretically impossible, but it's pretty unlikely that this strain would be a major concern in horses, given what we know right now. Considering the number of people that have been infected with H1N1, horses have certainly been exposed to this virus, but there are no reports of suspected equine infections.

While the risk of horses contracting H1N1 is very low, it can be reduced further with common sense practices to reduce the risk of exposure. If you may have influenza, avoid contact with people and other animals, including pets and horses, and get a flu shot.

Image source: http://graphicshunt.com

Equine Herpesvirus Outbreak In Florida

Scott Weese — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:06:00 -0500

Three barns at Calder Race Course in Florida have been quarantined after a horse was diagnosed with equine herpesvirus (EHV-1) infection. Horses from this barn are quarantined for 3 weeks and are not allowed to race. Other horses will not be allowed to enter the grounds for the next 2 weeks, but racing will continue with horses that are currently on the grounds and not under quarantine (1800 horses are present at the track). Track personnel believe the infection has been restricted to one horse but are taking these measures proactively.

Equine herpesvirus can cause a range of clinical signs, including fever and respiratory disease, severe neurological disease and abortion. The affected filly in this case had neurological disease and was euthanized. Outbreaks of abortions or neurological disease are the greatest concern, and a specific type of EHV-1 has been implicated as the main cause of neurological disease.

It's always hard to say what the most appropriate response is to a scenario like this. Equine herpesvirus is an endemic virus that is present throughout the world and lies dormant within a large percentage of healthy horses. Most infections are sporadic and only involve a single horse or small number of horses, but outbreaks can occur and that's why aggressive measures are sometimes taken. With only a single diagnosed case and no apparent evidence of transmission to other horses in this case, it's uncertain whether such an aggressive approach is required. However, it's worse to be too lax initially than too aggressive, and a logical approach is to implement aggressive measures, and then reassess them as more information becomes available. If no other horses develop signs consistent with EHV-1 infection, then loosening of the restrictions would be reasonable. If there is evidence of transmission and disease in other horses on the property, continuation with aggressive measures makes the most sense.

A great resource regarding EHV-1 is the ACVIM Consensus Statement on this subject, which is available on the equIDblog Resources page.

Image source: www.calderracecourse.com

UK Yanks Low-Risk Status For Canadian Mares

Scott Weese — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:07:00 -0500

The UK's Horserace Betting Levy Board (HBLB) has published their 2010 Codes of Practice for prevention and control of equine infectious diseases. As part of these codes, Canada and the US have lost their low-risk status for contagious equine metritis (CEM) because of the large 2008-2009 US outbreak of the disease (the HBLB calls it a US and Canadian outbreak, which isn't actually true). Canada is included presumably because of the number of exposed horses that entered the country (and the number of other unknown exposed horses that could have entered given the scope of the US outbreak) and perhaps the somewhat passive response by federal authorities in Canada.

The loss of low-risk status greatly affects how Canadian mares are handled upon arrival to breeding facilities in the UK, and will create major hassles for people moving horses to the UK for breeding. There's no indication whether this is a permanent change or whether it may be revisited with more information on the status of CEM in North America.

Image source: http://animalphotos.info/a/

Bug of the Month: Rotavirus

Scott Weese — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:00:00 -0500

Rotavirus is an important cause of diarrhea in young horses. (It's also a major cause of diarrhea in infants, but a different rotavirus is involved). Exposure to rotavirus is very common - most, if not all, horses are exposed to it early in life. Disease only occurs in foals, but not every foal that gets exposed becomes sick. Most often, rotavirus causes diarrhea if foals between 1 and 6 months of age, with most cases occurring between 1 and 3 months of age. Foals less than 1 month of age can be affected, but it's less common.

Foals become infected by swallowing the virus, which they usually pick up from the feces of other horses (including their mares) in their environment. The exact source of infection is rarely identified. It is likely that some healthy adult horses are the reservoirs and shed the virus in their manure.

Like other types of diarrhea, rotaviral diarrhea in foals can range from mild diarrhea alone to severe diarrhea with weakness, loss of appetite and dehydration. Colic can occur because of intestinal cramping associated with diarrhea. You cannot differentiate diarrhea due to rotavirus from other types of diarrhea by appearance alone. The diarrhea must be tested to identify the cause.

There is no specific treatment for rotavirus infection, but "supportive care" is often provided. One of the primary components of supportive care is fluid therapy, which may be needed for foals that start to become weak and dehydrated. Aggressive intravenous fluid therapy may be needed in some cases, depending on the severity.

Rotavirus vaccines are available in some regions, although there is limited evidence that they have much of an effect. Few people recommend vaccination. Rather, good attention to foal management practices, hygiene and early diagnosis of infected foals is the key. Foaling mares outside on pasture has been an effective practice in some outbreaks, presumably because there is less rotavirus contamination on pasture.

Image: Colourized TEM of rotavirus particles (source: CDC PHIL 173)