<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.lexblog.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Energy &amp; Environmental Law Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.vorysenergy.com/</link>
      <description>Energy &amp; Environmental Lawyer &amp; Attorney : Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease Law Firm : Oil, Gas &amp; Green Technology</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:41:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:41:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.movabletype.org</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:info uri="energyenvironmentallawblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.vorysenergy.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.vorysenergy.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsalloy.com/?rss=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsalloy.com/subrss3.gif">Subscribe with NewsAlloy</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://download.attensa.com/app/get_attensa.html?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.attensa.com/blogs/attensa/WindowsLiveWriter/BadgeredintoBadges_10C02/attensa_feed_button5.gif">Subscribe with Attensa for Outlook</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.flurry.com/pushRssFeed.do?r=fb&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.flurry.com/images/flurry_rss_logo2.gif">Subscribe with Flurry</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vorysenergy.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
         <title>FERC Technical Conferences</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has issued several notices regarding upcoming technical conferences:&amp;nbsp; for Electronic Tariff Filings, see &lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-4095.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;; for Guidance on the Preparation of Market-Based Rate filings, see &lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-4096.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(with &lt;strong&gt;webcast available&lt;/strong&gt;); and for FERC Form 552 potential changes, see &lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-4089.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Update:&amp;nbsp; If you are interested in the technical conference on FERC Form 552, it will now be &lt;strong&gt;webcast&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; See &lt;a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-4993.htm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for the details.&amp;nbsp; (Moved up.)]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/SJEAte82xc4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/SJEAte82xc4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/ferc-technical-conferences/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">FERC</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:31:05 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/ferc-technical-conferences/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Earthquakes</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;A new study released by the University of Texas and Southern Methodist University finds a correlation between a series of minor earthquakes in north Texas and the operations of a disposal well on Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport property, according to this &lt;a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/6907225.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the Houston Chronicle.&amp;nbsp; The take away at the end of the article:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;But he [i.e.,&amp;nbsp;an SMU geophysicist who worked on the study]&amp;nbsp;said the study raises more questions, since no quakes have been reported around the 200 other disposal wells in seven north Texas counties.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just remember:&amp;nbsp; Correlation does not imply causation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/xAdI6qMMYSY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/xAdI6qMMYSY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/earthquakes/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:19:59 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/earthquakes/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>EQT</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The WSJ is &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100309-716079.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that EQT intends to sell at least 12.5 million shares to fund production operations at its Marcellus Shale and Huron-Berea properties.&amp;nbsp; It also plans to raise its capital expenditures for the year by 41%, to $1.2 billion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Note:&amp;nbsp; Subscription required.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/bH40PpeW7l4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/bH40PpeW7l4/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eqt/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:09:45 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eqt/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Solar to Increase Utility Costs in CA?</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The NYT is &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/11/science/earth/11solar.html?ref=earth"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; on a plan by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power to increase electric utility rates to cover a $6 million a week budgetary shortfall &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; subsidize renewable energy sources, including the use of solar panels by Los Angeles' residents to contribute to the power grid.&amp;nbsp; While noting that solar energy should be a thriving local industry, the article further observes&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;that has never been the case, and experts cite cost as the main reason.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/wL54oXqjagM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/wL54oXqjagM/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/solar-to-increase-utility-costs-in-ca/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Solar</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:03:02 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/solar-to-increase-utility-costs-in-ca/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>WV Reporting Legislation Moves Forward</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Charleston Daily Mail is &lt;a href="http://www.dailymail.com/Business/201003080965"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that legislation to require reporting on source water and disposal plans related to hydraulic fracturing, as well as the additives used in the frac fluids, has cleared the Senate Natural Resources Committee.&amp;nbsp; Next stop:&amp;nbsp; the Senate Energy, Industry and Mining Committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/EOglZkP0LqU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/EOglZkP0LqU/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wv-reporting-legislation-moves-forward/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Hydraulic Fracturing</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:54:17 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wv-reporting-legislation-moves-forward/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Mexico's Oil Production</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The future of oil production in Mexico looks bleak, according to this &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/09/business/global/09pemex.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the NYT.&amp;nbsp; The U.S. link:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;'As you lose Mexican oil, you lose a critical supply,' said Jeremy M. Martin, director of the energy program at the Institute of the Americas at the University of California, San Diego. 'It&amp;rsquo;s not just about energy security but national security, because our neighbor&amp;rsquo;s economic and political well-being is largely linked to its capacity to produce and export oil.'&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/aXr3CfzX_KM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/aXr3CfzX_KM/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/mexicos-oil-production/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:49:54 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/mexicos-oil-production/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Wind Power's Challenges</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The NYT has an &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/03/08/08climatewire-plentiful-great-plains-power-blows-in-oppone-78112.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; on the challenges for expanding U.S. wind power generation, including a push for American jobs, rather than sending jobs to China; and low prices for competitive fuels such as natural gas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/7cCnGMSBFnY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/7cCnGMSBFnY/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wind-powers-challenges/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Wind</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 06:42:07 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wind-powers-challenges/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Laser Marcellus</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;We &lt;a href="http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/01/articles/energy/more-gathering-in-the-marcellus/"&gt;reported previously&lt;/a&gt; on the petition filed by Laser Marcellus Gathering Company, LLC, for a declaratory order that pipeline facilities it intends to construct from Pennsylvania into New York are functionally gathering and therefore exempt from Federal Energy Regulatory Commission jurisdiction under Section 1(b) of the Natural Gas Act.&amp;nbsp; The Commission recently granted that petition, noting that the fact that the facilities crossed the Pennsylvania-New York border did not affect the exemption:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The history of Commission and court interpretation of Section 1(b), &amp;hellip; makes clear that there is a distinction between gathering and transportation, such that the two functions are mutually exclusive. Consequently, otherwise non-jurisdictional production or gathering does not become jurisdictional on the basis that the facilities employed therefor cross a state line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a copy of the Commission's decision, see &lt;a href="http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (search Docket No. CP10-35).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/dwKYGdzAJrc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/dwKYGdzAJrc/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/laser-marcellus/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">FERC</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Gathering</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:12:51 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/laser-marcellus/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Sage Grouse</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Department of the Interior has found that the greater sage-grouse warrants protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), but that its listing is precluded by the need to address higher priority species first.&amp;nbsp; See &lt;a href="http://www.doi.gov/news/doinews/2010_03_05_news.cfm"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; As a consequence, it will be placed on a list of candidates for future action and not receive statutory protection under the ESA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For commentary, see &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/06/science/earth/06grouse.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; NYT article.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/aGQHZffZuW8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/aGQHZffZuW8/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/sage-grouse/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:01:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/sage-grouse/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>EPA Effluent Guidelines</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;On December 28, 2009, U.S. EPA issued a &lt;em&gt;Notice of Availability of Preliminary 2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan&lt;/em&gt; (74 Fed. Reg. 68599) (see &lt;a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a7202b"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and asked for comments on both its preliminary 2010 Plan and on its 2009 review of existing effluent guidelines and pretreatment standards, including comments on&amp;nbsp;industrial categories not currently regulated by effluent guidelines and pretreatment standards.&amp;nbsp; See Docket No. EPA-821-R-09-006 at &lt;a href="http://www.regulations.gov"&gt;www.regulations.gov&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Comments were submitted by both industry and environmental groups on the appropriateness of effluent guidelines for the oil and gas industry.&amp;nbsp; Earthjustice, for example, submitted comments urging U.S. EPA to expand its study of CBM operations &amp;quot;to include all techniques that may result in contamination of surface water or groundwater, including hydraulic fracturing in all formations.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; See &lt;a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ab16c5"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ab1e76"&gt;American Petroleum Institute&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;filed comments, on the other hand,&amp;nbsp;noting that CBM operations should not be subject to national effluent limitations guidelines and objecting to an expansion of U.S. EPA's study of CBM extraction to oil and gas operations more generally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/iqoHG71iI3M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/iqoHG71iI3M/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/epa-effluent-guidelines/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">CBM</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Hydraulic Fracturing</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Water</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:53:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/epa-effluent-guidelines/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Eagle Resources Targets Illinois Prospects</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Courier Press is &lt;a href="http://www.courierpress.com/news/2010/mar/06/wanted-ill-farmland-with-natural-gas-reserves/"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that Eagle Resources is targeting the New Albany Shale Group in southeastern Illinois.&amp;nbsp; Its current plans:&amp;nbsp; To drill three core sample wells around the first quarter of 2011, followed, hopefully, with drilling for production.&amp;nbsp; To success!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/UxxGNUdrT08" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/UxxGNUdrT08/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eagle-resources-targets-illinois-prospects/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:57:21 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eagle-resources-targets-illinois-prospects/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>U.S. Supreme Court PMPA Decision</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in &lt;em&gt;Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co., LLC&lt;/em&gt;, Docket No. 08-240 (Mar. 2, 2010), that a franchisee cannot recover for constructive termination under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA) if the franchisor's wrongful conduct&amp;nbsp;failed to&amp;nbsp;compel the franchisee to abandon the franchise.&amp;nbsp; See &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;source=hp&amp;amp;q=us+supreme+court&amp;amp;aq=f&amp;amp;aqi=g10&amp;amp;aql=&amp;amp;oq="&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/pjhgEzhytLk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/pjhgEzhytLk/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/us-supreme-court-pmpa-decision/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:42:22 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/us-supreme-court-pmpa-decision/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Negotiated Rates (FERC)</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently rejected a shipper's attempt to require FERC approval for a pipeline's rate changes under a negotiated contract.&amp;nbsp; See &lt;em&gt;Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission&lt;/em&gt; (Docket No. 08-1195) (Feb. 26, 2010) (see &lt;a href="http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- opinions).&amp;nbsp; The court found that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The contract&amp;rsquo;s plain language settles this matter. Even if we were to consider this extrinsic evidence, it is of no help to Iberdrola. Both parties were aware that FERC had instructed Alliance to remove that language [i.e., language making rate changes subject to FERC review]&amp;nbsp;from its tariff and to include it in the Transportation Agreement if the parties wanted FERC approval for any negotiated rate changes. They were, therefore, on notice that FERC would only review rate changes if the parties included such a provision in their contract. Their knowledge of how FERC would read the contract is the most probative piece of extrinsic evidence of the parties&amp;rsquo; intent, and it cuts strongly against Iberdrola.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because the negotiated contract did not include an express role for FERC, the court followed &amp;quot;the well-established rule that freely negotiated rates are presumed just and reasonable.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/wHCTtQe6yuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/wHCTtQe6yuc/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/negotiated-rates-ferc/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">FERC</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:23:39 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/negotiated-rates-ferc/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Colorado Conversion</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Daily Sentinel has an &lt;a href="http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/articles/demand_for_natural_gas_could_g/"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; on potential Colorado environmental legislation that would convert several coal-fired power plants to natural gas (900 megawatts).&amp;nbsp; From the article, it looks like everyone wins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/7V-RHs8xhfM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/7V-RHs8xhfM/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/colorado-conversion/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:02:10 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/colorado-conversion/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Sen. Rockefeller Introduces GHG Legislation</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;Senator Rockefeller (D-WV) has introduced legislation to delay action by U.S. EPA on greenhouse gas regulation for stationary sources for a period of two years, according to this &lt;a href="http://rockefeller.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=322764&amp;amp;"&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt; from the Senator's office.&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;The legislation directs that for two years after enactment the EPA can take no regulatory action and that no stationary source shall be subject to any requirement to obtain a permit or meet a New Source Performance Standard under the Clean Air Act with respect to carbon dioxide or methane, except for the widely-supported motor vehicle emission standards.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The press release provides a link to the proposed legislation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/omE1gZhvcMo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/omE1gZhvcMo/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/sen-rockefeller-introduces-ghg-legislation/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">GHG</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:42:16 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/sen-rockefeller-introduces-ghg-legislation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Energy Security</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The NYT is &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/05/business/global/05iht-energy.html"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; on steps being taken by the European Union (EU) to strengthen its access to reliable natural gas resources, including pledging nearly $300 million to fund the Nabucco project - a pipeline designed to bring gas in from the Caspian Sea region and bypass Russian supplies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/hOseBFyVyE0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/hOseBFyVyE0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/energy-security/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:57:04 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/energy-security/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Mobile Methane Detectors</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Dallas Morning News is &lt;a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/city/denton/flowermound/stories/030410dnmetdish.172c7a15e.html"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; on claims made by researchers that mobile methane detectors have found plumes near natural gas facilities located in Barnett Shale counties.&amp;nbsp; Looks like they may be centered around compressor stations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/tbeG5j7w0J0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/tbeG5j7w0J0/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/mobile-methane-detectors/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/tags">Air</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category><category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:49:51 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/mobile-methane-detectors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>EIA Storage Report</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;The Energy Information Administration (EIA) has &lt;a href="http://ir.eia.doe.gov/ngs/ngs.html?featureclicked=3&amp;amp;"&gt;reported&lt;/a&gt; a 116 Bcf decline in storage from the previous week.&amp;nbsp; Graphically:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img height="330" alt="" width="637" src="http://www.vorysenergy.com/uploads/image/ngs(7).gif" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That leaves working gas in storage at 1,737 Bcf, only 21 Bcf above the 5-year average and well within the 5-year range (as illustrated above).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/UmhlyLjGgas" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/UmhlyLjGgas/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eia-storage-report/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:44:35 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/eia-storage-report/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Wave Power</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;Several utilities and states are looking at harnessing the hydrokinetic energy of ocean waves, according to this &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/03/02/02climatewire-companies-work-to-harness-the-power-of-waves-5213.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the NYT.&amp;nbsp; Marine renewables?&amp;nbsp; Very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/EUOfbp2S0-g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/EUOfbp2S0-g/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wave-power/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Energy</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:40:40 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/energy/wave-power/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Bush Tougher on Polluters than Obama?</title>
         <description>&lt;p&gt;We couldn't resist the title.&amp;nbsp; The WSJ is &lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704125804575096110542113040.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_news"&gt;reporting&lt;/a&gt; that U.S. EPA under the Obama administration has forced polluters to pay in fiscal 2009 less than in the previous year:&amp;nbsp; &amp;quot;In fiscal 2009, the EPA's enforcement office required polluters to spend more than $5 billion on cleanup and emission controls&amp;mdash;down from $11.8 billion the previous year, according to a report recently published by the agency.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That won't last, will it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Note:&amp;nbsp; Subscription required.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~4/4Bt8vgCp-1Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/EnergyEnvironmentalLawBlog/~3/4Bt8vgCp-1Q/</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/environment/bush-tougher-on-polluters-than-obama/</guid>
         <category domain="http://www.vorysenergy.com/articles">Environment</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:32:27 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Vorys</dc:creator>
      
      <feedburner:origLink>http://www.vorysenergy.com/2010/03/articles/environment/bush-tougher-on-polluters-than-obama/</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
